IHC moved against media censorship

Published July 30, 2019
A petition has been filed in the Islamabad High Court against what it described as media censorship and taking off air private television channels giving time to opposition politicians.  — AFP/File
A petition has been filed in the Islamabad High Court against what it described as media censorship and taking off air private television channels giving time to opposition politicians. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: A petition has been filed in the Islamabad High Court against what it described as media censorship and taking off air private television channels giving time to opposition politicians.

Advocate Mir Aurangzeb cited in his petition the information and broadcasting secretary and the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) as respondents. The petition said: “There is unrest in society during these days and the media is raising a hue and cry for being pressed by the respondents. It is complained that the respondents are not permitting the media to publish or telecast impartial news and press conferences of the opposition leaders.”

Citing prominent journalist Hamid Mir’s column, the petition pointed out that the “media is being censored in the country and TV channels are also being closed”. Likewise, referring to anchorperson Shahzaib Khanzada’s programme, it claimed that the government had restrained the media from covering the rallies of some opposition leaders.

Moreover, it added, “the respondents have imposed censorship in the name of press advice and are also trying to pressurise the media through establishment of media courts”. According to the petition, TV channels like Geo and Channel 24 had either been taken off air or pushed to last numbers in order to penalise them for giving time to the opposition leaders.

The petition claimed that the respondents were taking punitive measures against TV channels even without issuing them any show-cause notice or giving them opportunity of being heard.

It said citizens could not be deprived of their right to listen to views expressed by the opposition leaders, adding that the respondents were taking discriminatory action against the channels telecasting news about the opposition.

“The action of the respondents are absolutely illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice,” it argued.

The petitioner requested the court to declare that the respondents had no lawful authority to impose illegal bans or restrictions on the print and electronic media.

Published in Dawn, July 30th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...
Energy shock
Updated 05 May, 2026

Energy shock

The longer the crisis persists, the more profound its consequences will be.
Unchecked HIV
05 May, 2026

Unchecked HIV

PAKISTAN’S HIV surge is no longer a slow-burning public health concern. It is now a system failure unfolding in...
PSL thrills
05 May, 2026

PSL thrills

BY the end of it all, in front of fans who had been absent for almost the entire 11th season of the Pakistan Super...