Pompeo’s conditions for Afghan peace: political outcome, end of terrorism

Published May 1, 2019
US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo says that the United States is committed to two main objectives in Afghanistan — a political solution to the Afghan conflict and preventing future terrorist attacks. — AP/File
US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo says that the United States is committed to two main objectives in Afghanistan — a political solution to the Afghan conflict and preventing future terrorist attacks. — AP/File

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo says that the United States is committed to two main objectives in Afghanistan — a political solution to the Afghan conflict and preventing future terrorist attacks.

In a wide-ranging interview to a congressional news outlet, The Hill, Secretary Pompeo also emphasised the need for a broad coalition of non-Taliban Afghans to strengthen the Afghan peace process.

Asked how would America define victory in Afghanistan, the chief US diplomat listed these two “necessary conditions” that Washington was trying to achieve there.

“What is winning? Are we winning in Afghanistan?” asked the interviewer, The Hill’s editor-in-chief Bob Cusack.

“We are working to achieve a reconciliation so that this conflict now coming on two decades can be resolved. We can take down the violence level, we can get a political outcome. That’s a necessary condition,” Mr Pompeo responded.

“The second necessary condition is that we continue to be able to perform our counter-terror operations, the ones we were speaking about before.”

Although Mr Pompeo did not define victory, he did highlight US efforts to promote the Afghan peace process.

“We’re working with partners and allies in the region, and we’re working with people that we have not worked within an awfully long time,” he said, adding that US special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad was already in the region trying to resume the US-Taliban talks.

Read: Khalilzad to visit Islamabad, Kabul again

Mr Khalilzad, who was in Islamabad on Monday, tweeted on Tuesday that the US was pursuing peace in Afghanistan so that “vital democratic values & institutions like free press grow only stronger.”

In an interview to Afghanistan’s Tolo news agency on Sunday, Mr Khalilzad said that an Afghan peace deal hinged on Taliban accepting a ceasefire.

His boss, Secretary Pompeo, however, said that the participation of non-Taliban Afghans was also necessary for ending the Afghan war.

Taliban have held six rounds of direct talks with a US team, headed by Mr Khalilzad, but are refusing to talk to the Afghan government.

Besides, intra-Afghan dialogue, Secretary Pompeo also underlined the need for combating those terrorist groups that are still operating in Afghanistan.

“ISIS in particular — they’re in Afghanistan too, but we still have Al Qaeda and other Sunni terror operations in Afghanistan as well to make sure that we can continue to prevent an attack on the homeland from Afghanistan,” he said.

“We need a broad coalition of non-Taliban Afghans to come together.

We need President (Ashraf) Ghani to be successful so that we can ultimately get that political resolution,” he said.

This new emphasis on an intra-Afghan coalition reflects a hardening of attitude in Washington where policy makers want to ensure that the insurgents do not see their eagerness for peace as a sign of weakness.

“It will ultimately be up to the Afghan people to determine if this reconciliation can be successful,” Secretary Pompeo said.

Published in Dawn, May 1st, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Updated 19 May, 2022

To be or not to be

The same decision taken weeks or months from now will have far more devastating consequences.
19 May, 2022

Impact on Punjab

THE Supreme Court judgement interpreting the issue of disqualification of parliamentarians under Article 63A of the...
19 May, 2022

Forest fires

THOUGH spot and forest fires have become a perennial phenomenon especially in peak summer, the recent blazes —...
18 May, 2022

SC on defections

THE judgement is monumental and will significantly influence Pakistani politics for years to come. After a nearly...
18 May, 2022

Karachi blast

THE frequency of urban terrorism incidents over the past few weeks in Karachi should send alarm bells ringing within...
18 May, 2022

Threats to Imran Khan

IT seems there is never a dull moment in Imran Khan’s life. First, it was a cabal of local and international...