PM’s request

Published September 3, 2018

To be fair, no government can be expected to work miracles within weeks of coming to power. That is why Imran Khan’s request at a meeting with a number of anchorpersons at Prime Minister House in Islamabad — that his government be given three months before its performance is criticised — is not unreasonable.

Among the issues discussed were: the accountability of PTI leaders; the use of official helicopters by the Punjab chief minister’s family; the altercation between the First Lady’s former husband and DPO Pakpattan that resulted in the latter’s transfer; and unseemly remarks by the Punjab information minister against a theatre star. The prime minister assured the media persons that there would be a perceptible difference in how the country was run in three months’ time.

The prime minister has a point, to some extent. There are many areas of governance in Pakistan that require major systemic reform. Sound policies are needed, and these will only show incremental results over time. For example, Finance Minister Asad Umar has said it may take up to three years to stabilise Pakistan’s deteriorating financial situation.

Shrill denunciations are not going to hasten the process. Thus it is only fitting that the new administration, barely two weeks into its term, be cut some slack over policy matters in the initial few months. However, that does not mean the media should turn a blind eye to the missteps and avoidable mistakes made by the government in the meantime. After all, while PTI has come into power at the centre for the first time, it has led the KP government for the last five years and should have a grip on what is required to avoid kerfuffles that only provide fodder for naysayers and distract from the larger picture.

The actions and utterances of those occupying some of the top government posts have come in for valid criticism. So has PTI’s stated intention to overhaul media regulation — the federal information minister used that loaded word, ‘censorship’ — a move denounced by various journalist bodies.

Such missteps have taken away from some of the positives: for example, the government has lifted political censorship from all state-run media outlets, and some of its appointees to important posts are competent individuals. The media must be a watchdog for public interest, but a balanced one, at the same time.

Published in Dawn, September 3rd, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Lebanon truce
Updated 25 Apr, 2026

Lebanon truce

THE fact that the truce between Israel and Lebanon has been extended for three weeks should be welcomed. But there...
Terrorism again
25 Apr, 2026

Terrorism again

THE elimination of 22 terrorists in an intelligence-based operation in Khyber highlights both the scale and ...
Taxing technology
25 Apr, 2026

Taxing technology

THE recent decision by the FBR’s Directorate General of Customs Valuation to increase the ‘assessed value’ of...
Pahalgam aftermath
24 Apr, 2026

Pahalgam aftermath

A YEAR after at least 26 people were killed in a terrorist attack in occupied Kashmir’s Pahalgam area, ties ...
Real estate power
24 Apr, 2026

Real estate power

THE latest round of land valuation revisions by the FBR for tax purposes signifies a familiar pattern that ...
Ad astra
Updated 24 Apr, 2026

Ad astra

AMONG the many developments this month that Pakistanis can take pride in is the news that one of their own will soon...