Parliament’s work

Published August 8, 2018

AFTER victory, a distancing from the public and most elected representatives usually begins. The distancing is blamed on the rigours of high office and security constraints, and tightly scripted public appearances quickly replace meaningful interactions with the public and the media. But incoming prime minister Imran Khan is vowing to approach his job in a more accessible manner than many of his predecessors.

On Monday, he pledged to set aside one hour a week as prime minister for a so-called people’s hour to answer questions from the public. If implemented with purpose and sincerity, Mr Khan’s people’s hour could set a new precedent for an incumbent prime minister facing the public and answering the people’s concerns directly. In previous administrations, attempts at a people’s hour quickly devolved into little more than PR exercises and propaganda. As an opposition figure, Mr Khan has been one of the most visible national politicians and relatively accessible to the media, his party and supporters. As prime minister, he should be accessible at public forums to all Pakistanis, not merely individuals who agree with his politics.

While a people’s hour is a laudable choice, a prime minister’s responsibilities to parliament are central to strengthening democratic institutions. As an opposition figure, Mr Khan has been largely indifferent to parliament and its work; as prime minister, his attitude must surely change. Parliament has suffered gravely from the treatment meted out to it by its leaders over the past decade. Yousuf Raza Gilani as prime minister did routinely participate in parliamentary proceedings and was frequently present in his chambers, but the prime minister’s office during the last PPP-led federal government was arguably eclipsed by the presence of party boss Asif Zardari in the presidency. Yet, the undermining of parliament as the focal point of democracy was surely the greatest in the past decade during Nawaz Sharif’s term as prime minister. Once elected by the National Assembly as prime minister, Mr Sharif rarely participated in parliamentary proceedings. This lack of interest was quickly emulated by most members of Mr Sharif’s cabinet and by PML-N MNAs generally, leaving the National Assembly struggling to maintain quorum for the most part.

If Mr Khan is truly committed to strengthening democratic institutions, he must not only regularly participate in parliamentary proceedings but also present himself for questioning and accountability by the opposition. In the UK, Prime Minister’s Questions is held in the House of Commons every Wednesday at noon when parliament is in session and is broadcast live to the nation. It has provided some memorable and riveting political exchanges. If Mr Khan does opt for such a mechanism, the opposition should rise to the occasion too and put meaningful questions to the prime minister rather than merely indulge in grandstanding.

Published in Dawn, August 8th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...