Report finds 456 died in UK hospital by unjustified drug use

Published June 21, 2018
PORTSMOUTH (Britain): Bishop James Jones, who led the Gosport War Memorial Hospital inquiry panel, holds a copy of ‘The Report of the Gosport Independent Panel’, outside the Portsmouth Cathedral on Wednesday.—Reuters
PORTSMOUTH (Britain): Bishop James Jones, who led the Gosport War Memorial Hospital inquiry panel, holds a copy of ‘The Report of the Gosport Independent Panel’, outside the Portsmouth Cathedral on Wednesday.—Reuters

More than 450 patients died prematurely in a British hospital after they were given powerful painkillers for no medical reason in what a damning report found was a “disregard for human life”. An independent panel found that between 1989 and 2000 at the Gosport War Memorial Hospital in southern England, there was an institutionalised regime of prescribing and administering dangerous doses of opioids which were not clinically justified.

“There was a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening the lives of a large number of patients,” the report said, adding that warnings from nurses had been ignored and there had been a failure by police and medical regulators to protect patients. It added: “The families, and indeed the nation as a whole, are entitled to ask how these events could have happened; how the hospital dismissed the nurses’ concerns and subsequently took no action; how the healthcare organisations failed to intervene.”

The 387-page report concluded that 456 patients were given opioids without justification and “probably at least another 200 patients similarly affected but whose clinical notes were not found”. The report noted the Gosport deaths and the concerns raised about them occurred at the same time as it was revealed that British family physician Harold Shipman, dubbed “Dr Death” had been responsible for killing patients in his care with lethal heroin injections. Shipman, convicted in 2000 for murdering 15 patients, killed as many as 250 people in his care according to a later inquiry.

But the panel examining the Gosport scandal said the circumstances were different. “We draw a distinction because Harold Shipman acted alone, apparently, whereas what we are describing to you in this report is an institutionalised practice and that is a significant difference,” Reverend James Jones, the chairman of the independent panel, told reporters.

Published in Dawn, June 21st, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....
Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...