Report on IHK

Published June 16, 2018

The murder of Kashmir Rising editor, Shujaat Bukhari, is a direct consequence of the ruinous policies that have made India-held Kashmir a seething cauldron of rage and despair.

At last, however, in the first-ever report by the UN’s Office of the High Commission of Human Rights about the disputed region, the suffering of its people at the hands of the Indian government has found expression on the global stage, where it deserves the attention it has scarcely received from the rest of the world.

The report, which calls for a high-level UN investigation, documents the grotesque human rights violations in IHK since 2016, when the murder of Burhan Wani by the Indian army triggered the latest uprising.

Excessive force has resulted in hundreds of deaths and injuries; use of pellet-firing shotguns has left many protesters with vision impairment. Other depredations include enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests and detentions — including of minors — torture, rape, etc. There is seemingly no end to the dehumanisation of the local population at the hands of a state determined to break them.

The special laws in force in IHK enable this violence. As the report rightly notes, they allow the security forces to act with total impunity, and “jeopardise the right to remedy for victims” — in other words, it is a staggeringly unequal conflict.

Predictably, India has rejected the UN agency’s findings out of hand as being “fallacious, tendentious and motivated”, a reaction that displays the same arrogance and myopia as that which drives its policies.

While Pakistan too has come in for its share of criticism, the report implicitly concedes that the situation in Azad Kashmir bears little resemblance to the calamitous conditions in IHK. Certainly, the OHCHR was constrained by the lack of access to both sides of the Line of Control. However, it has relied upon material already in the public domain and accessed through right to information laws, and has used what it describes as a “reasonable grounds” standard of proof to arrive at its findings.

The fact is, what has been transpiring in IHK has been documented by many of those living that reality every day; it is only that the world chose not to see it. For a country like India that aspires to a seat at the UN Security Council and similar decision-making bodies, the only befitting response to the report should be an unequivocal commitment to act on it.

Published in Dawn, June 16th, 2018

Opinion

Enter the deputy PM

Enter the deputy PM

Clearly, something has changed since for this step to have been taken and there are shifts in the balance of power within.

Editorial

All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...
Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...