AN ESCALATING controversy over the JIT probing the family of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif demands the urgent attention of the Supreme Court.

There are at least three problems with the composition and functioning of the JIT that have combined to cast a shadow over the entire process so far.

First, and most recently, a leaked still image of Hussain Nawaz, son of Mr Sharif, from a CCTV recording inside the room where the JIT is conducting its inquiry has ricocheted across the political and media landscapes.

There has been no explanation so far about how the image found its way into the public domain, why the JIT proceedings appear to have been recorded surreptitiously, and where the recordings are stored and who has access to them.

The JIT is effectively acting as an investigatory arm of the Supreme Court, and its findings could have a far-reaching impact on the country’s politics.

It is disturbing that a media circus appears to be tarnishing the sanctity of the judicial process.

Second, there are the as yet unexplained reasons for the registrar of the Supreme Court reaching out to several of the agencies that have supplied representatives to form the JIT.

It is to be expected that all court communications to government agencies will be properly documented and will scrupulously adhere to rules and norms in the conduct of such communications.

That standard does not appear to have been met in the informal calls made by the registrar — giving rise to serious questions regarding the unsolicited telephone calls over the internet.

Perhaps it was only a matter of laxity, but the court should explain why it occurred and directly address the worrying questions about undue influence on state agencies.

Third, there is the original problem: the inclusion of two members of military-led intelligence agencies in what are essentially financial matters that the JIT is probing.

Unlike the other nominated members of the JIT, the credentials of the two intelligence representatives do not appear to have been assessed for whether they are relevant to the matter before the JIT.

An unnecessarily deferential attitude was taken in a matter that should never have involved military-led intelligence representatives in the first place.

It is important to reiterate what is at stake here.

A historic set of hearings in the Supreme Court has for the first time probed the sources of income and wealth of a serving prime minister of the country and his family.

Besides the political future of the prime minister and his family, the integrity of the democratic process itself is being tested.

The Supreme Court is, therefore, the right forum to decide a matter of such profound implications. What is needed now is a reiteration that rules and the law will be scrupulously adhered to.

Published in Dawn, June 6th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Another lynching
Updated 22 Jun, 2024

Another lynching

The chilling alternative to not doing anything — which appears to be the state’s preferred option — is the advent of mob rule.
Tax & representation
22 Jun, 2024

Tax & representation

THE taxation measures outlined in the budget for the incoming fiscal year have triggered a lot of concern among ...
Life of the party?
22 Jun, 2024

Life of the party?

THE launch of Awaam Pakistan, a party led by former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and former finance minister...
KP’s ‘power struggle’
Updated 21 Jun, 2024

KP’s ‘power struggle’

Instead of emboldening protesters, CM Gandapur should encourage his provincial subjects to clear their due bills and ensure theft is minimised.
Journalist’s murder
21 Jun, 2024

Journalist’s murder

ANOTHER name has been added to the list of journalists murdered in Pakistan. On Tuesday, Khalil Jibran’s vehicle...
A leaner government?
21 Jun, 2024

A leaner government?

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb has reiterated his government’s ‘commitment’ to shutting down ministries...