Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Pakistan looks for survivable second strike capability: former envoy

Updated Apr 21, 2017 11:05am


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan does not want to match the Indian nuclear arsenal, but will do all it can to keep its deterrence credible, says a nuclear expert.

“We are not talking of parity, we are looking for proportionality, we are looking for survivable second strike capability,” Pakistan’s former ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva Zamir Akram said while speaking at a seminar organised by the Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) on ‘South Asian Nuclear Doctrines: Deterrence Equilibrium and Strategic Stability’.

“True workable and credible deterrence comes only with second strike capability, which is being developed,” he said and noted that the most important requirement was to ensure that no gap in deterrence existed for which Full Spectrum Deterrence doctrine was being pursued.

Mr Akram expressed fears that India could be developing capacity to carry out a disarming strike against Pakistan. Referring to a statement by MIT scholar Vipin Narang and assertions by other Indian officials, he said: “Increasingly what we are hearing … [that India is aiming] to build capacity, the capability to carry out a disarming first strike against Pakistan for completely destroying and demolishing our nuclear assets.”

He contended that the disclosures never came as a surprise for Pakistani strategists who had already done their planning on the assumption that Indians could try to do that. “We could not have based our deterrence capabilities and defence capacity on a mere verbal commitment given by India.”

The former envoy noted that threats were growing in the region due to large-scale acquisition of military hardware by India, its public rejection of the policy of no-first use of nuclear weapons, determination to carry out disarming strikes against Pakistan, and its espousal of dangerous and destabilising doctrines like the Cold Start Doctrine.

In his presentation, Dr Zafar Nawaz Jaspal, who teaches at the Quaid-i-Azam University, noted that both Pakistan and India lacked the “proficiency in decapitation capability”. He said he was cautiously optimistic about deterrence stability continuing because both countries were aware of the colossal cost of its failure. However, warmongering by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, arms race and non-state actors were constraining the deterrence stability, he added.

SVI President Dr Zafar Iqbal Cheema was hopeful that India would stay away from carrying out disarming strikes against Pakistan. “A successful disarming, decapitating or pre-emptive strike against adversary possessing credible nuclear weapons capability is considered an impossibility as a rational decision,” he maintained, hoping that India would act as “a rational actor and would not undertake this dangerous exercise of launching a pre-emptive strike”.

He said there was no precedent of even a failed pre-emptive strike against a nuclear state and even in South Asia the concept had long been laid to rest. India, he recalled, had in the 1980s considered conventional military doctrine of pre-emption against Pakistan’s nuclear infrastructure, but had to abandon its plans.

Published in Dawn, April 21st, 2017


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

Comments (10) Closed

PaTriot Apr 21, 2017 09:17am

I would suggest to people of both countries that please leave those political leaders behind who are selling hatred on either side.Just don't follow them blindly,please don't.And teach the same to your beautiful children,as well.

Samir lone Apr 21, 2017 09:31am

Pakistan ALREADY does have multiple strike options including land, surface vessel, aircraft and submarine launched platforms. Good work armed forces and strategic plans division!

Ash20 Apr 21, 2017 09:39am

Keep talking about nuclear attack so casually. Have you ever heard Chinese,Russians, Indians, British, France talking about nuclear attack every fortnight.

Robert Apr 21, 2017 09:59am

History suggests that the world continuously keep changing along with people who inhabit it. The idea of the Indian Sub-continent is a genuine composition of diversity and tolerance. There is no place like it in the world today. It is up to us to keep making improvements in this sub-continent and never give up.

Mohajir Apr 21, 2017 10:07am

Enough of Nuclear weapons.

Pakistan needs schools, hospitals, jobs and not more weapons.

John Apr 21, 2017 10:12am

Wow! And this won't affect the regional stability and peace? Every time we purchase weapons, there is hue and cry from other side. But if they do the same, it's okay?

JKhan Apr 21, 2017 10:43am

Revise all plans once Nawaz resigns.

IMTIAZ ALI KHAN Apr 21, 2017 10:47am

What nonsense enough of hurting our very own family. This goes to Pakistan and India.

IndoPak Blood Brothers 4 Life!

R S Chakravarti Apr 21, 2017 01:51pm

@IMTIAZ ALI KHAN I really appreciate your posts.

Mohammed daud Apr 21, 2017 09:25pm

To prepare for the worse is the best defense.