The rumbles of discontent in the Pak-US relationship are growing once again.

Following the collapse of the Afghan peace talks and the final-year administration of US President Barack Obama determinedly pushing ahead with the deepening of US-India ties, Pakistani policymakers appear to believe that regional developments bode ill for this country’s security interests.

Certainly, the Pak-US relationship has been characterised by a contradiction in recent years: while both countries’ leaderships have insisted that the relationship is of allies and even strategic in nature, it has been obvious that bilateral ties are essentially transactional in nature.

Read: No intention to diminish relations with Pakistan: US

Now the terms of the transaction appear to be changing, precipitated perhaps by the US that Pakistan is unable to deliver the Afghan Taliban to the negotiating table.

With the US firmly in the election cycle, it is unlikely that any major policy change will be considered.

At best, the two US officials making the rounds of Islamabad and, likely, Rawalpindi will be able to balance Pakistani discontent with US disillusionment.

The wider problem will remain, however: how to redefine the Pak-US relationship in a way that is realistic and honest?

There is a tendency inside Pakistani policymaking circles to see more threats than opportunities and to view foreign policy as a zero-sum game with India.

Yet, the very countries that Pakistan is most interested in or concerned by demonstrate a significantly different approach. Competition between the US and China is allegedly driving Great Power realignments, but the US and China remain vital trading partners.

Trade is also a significant aspect of India-China ties, even as India and the US pull closer to counter Chinese influence.

And India is engaging Iran and Saudi Arabia simultaneously, something Pakistan seems unwilling to do. To be sure, Pakistan does have legitimate security concerns, and many of those centre on India’s growing military strength.

But a narrow vision of security dominating all other aspects of national power may only leave Pakistan more vulnerable in the regional and international arenas.

Pakistan needs to contribute more positively to the regional order — projects like CPEC and a tentative outreach to Central Asia need to be emphasised in all geographical directions.

It is here where perhaps Pakistan itself, notwithstanding US policy errors, has failed: there is little mention now of trade, investment, remittances or significant cooperation with the US outside the security arena.

Examine: Love US, hate US

With policymakers here apparently not averse to letting bilateral ties be defined almost entirely in security and military terms, the US appears increasingly willing to transfer blame when there are failures on to Pakistan.

Be it the Afghan Taliban or anti-India militants, the US is discarding nuances in its policy approach. A new leader in the White House may well reverse the slide, but Pakistan should not expect that to necessarily occur.

Published in Dawn, June 11th, 2016

Opinion

Sub judice rule
18 Sep 2021

Sub judice rule

It is time this objection, sub judice, is laid to rest.
The Black Caps folly
Updated 18 Sep 2021

The Black Caps folly

There is so much wrong — and worrying — about the entire sorry episode of New Zealand backing out of Pakistan tour.
CT NAP revisited
Updated 18 Sep 2021

CT NAP revisited

A policy of appeasement towards extremists has undermined the state’s writ.
Pathways for reform
Updated 17 Sep 2021

Pathways for reform

Even now the government has said they are listening, but they have not said how they are listening.

Editorial

Blinken’s remarks
Updated 18 Sep 2021

Blinken’s remarks

The US establishment cannot scapegoat Pakistan for two decades of bad policy in Afghanistan.
18 Sep 2021

Worrying survey

THE findings of the Labour Force Survey 2018-19 indicate that some important headline trends have already taken or...
18 Sep 2021

Special needs

THE fact that only 3,653 children with special needs, out of some 300,000 in Sindh, are registered with the...
TTP amnesty?
Updated 17 Sep 2021

TTP amnesty?

An amnesty should be for some individuals, not the entire outfit.
17 Sep 2021

Media regulation

THE needless controversy over media regulation may finally be heading for a resolution. In a meeting with ...
17 Sep 2021

Refusing audit

THE continuous resistance put up by several public-sector organisations to submitting their accounts for audit by ...