SC unseats PML-N’s Omar Ayub

Published June 20, 2015
A three-judge bench had taken up a review petition moved by PTI candidate Dr Raja Aamer Zaman against the court’s March 7, 2014 judgement. — APP/File
A three-judge bench had taken up a review petition moved by PTI candidate Dr Raja Aamer Zaman against the court’s March 7, 2014 judgement. — APP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Friday unseated PML-N’s Omar Ayub Khan from the National Assembly constituency NA-19 Haripur in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and ordered the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to hold a by-election there.

A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja and consisting of Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, had taken up a review petition moved by PTI candidate Dr Raja Aamer Zaman against the court’s March 7, 2014 judgement. The decision was a two-to-one verdict, with Justice Saeed dissenting. The main judgement was authored by Justice Khawaja.

Dr Raja Zaman was declared the returned candidate during the 2013 general elections from the NA-19 constituency after securing 116,979 votes against Mr Ayub’s 114,807. A recount was ordered, but Dr Zaman remained the successful candidate, though his original victory margin of 2,172 was reduced to 1,304.

Consequently, Mr Ayub challenged the result before an election tribunal, which, in its judgement on Dec 31, 2013, ordered re-polling in seven stations instead of declaring the election void.

The tribunal’s order was challenged by Dr Zaman before the apex court, which dismissed the same. Consequently, he filed a review petition against the judgement, which was accepted and his opponent was de-seated.

In the judgement, Justice Khawaja observed that the elections in NA-19 Haripur stood vitiated and contaminated when it became evident that voting at the seven polling stations had materially affected the outcome of the election.

Thus, the prejudice towards Dr Zaman is evident, the judgment said, adding that the failure to properly apply election laws would also be, by definition, prejudicial not only to the petitioner but also to the entire constituency because they would not be able to elect a parliamentarian in the by-election.

Therefore, the ECP will hold a by-election for the constituency in accordance with the law, the judgement stated.

Meanwhile, in his note of dissent, Justice Saeed observed that in the eventuality of a failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of the Representation of Peoples Act (RoPA), 1976, and elections rules, the election tribunal may declare the entire election as void in exercise of powers under Section 70 of RoPA. But at the same time, it cannot be deprived of the jurisdiction to grant partial relief by declaring the election at a few polling stations void and directing a re-poll there.

Published in Dawn June 20th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Another lynching
Updated 22 Jun, 2024

Another lynching

The chilling alternative to not doing anything — which appears to be the state’s preferred option — is the advent of mob rule.
Tax & representation
22 Jun, 2024

Tax & representation

THE taxation measures outlined in the budget for the incoming fiscal year have triggered a lot of concern among ...
Life of the party?
22 Jun, 2024

Life of the party?

THE launch of Awaam Pakistan, a party led by former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and former finance minister...
KP’s ‘power struggle’
Updated 21 Jun, 2024

KP’s ‘power struggle’

Instead of emboldening protesters, CM Gandapur should encourage his provincial subjects to clear their due bills and ensure theft is minimised.
Journalist’s murder
21 Jun, 2024

Journalist’s murder

ANOTHER name has been added to the list of journalists murdered in Pakistan. On Tuesday, Khalil Jibran’s vehicle...
A leaner government?
21 Jun, 2024

A leaner government?

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb has reiterated his government’s ‘commitment’ to shutting down ministries...