British MPs pass non-binding vote to recognise Palestine

Published October 14, 2014
A passer-by carries a Union Flag umbrella past a pro-Palestine demonstration outside the Houses of Parliament in London October 13, 2014.—Photo by Reuters
A passer-by carries a Union Flag umbrella past a pro-Palestine demonstration outside the Houses of Parliament in London October 13, 2014.—Photo by Reuters
.— Photo by Reuters
.— Photo by Reuters
Young Jewish men argue with Pro-Palestinian supporters beside a giant banner calling for a recognised Palestinian State.— Photo by Reuters
Young Jewish men argue with Pro-Palestinian supporters beside a giant banner calling for a recognised Palestinian State.— Photo by Reuters

LONDON: British lawmakers voted overwhelmingly in favour of recognising Palestine as a state on Monday, in a non-binding motion heavy with symbolism but unlikely to change government policy.

The motion was passed by 274 in favour to 12 votes against, to “recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel” as part of a “contribution to securing a negotiated two-state solution”.

The House of Commons debate was being watched around the world after Sweden drew anger from Israel this month for saying it would recognise Palestine.

It was initiated by backbencher Grahame Morris from the main opposition Labour party, who said Britain had a “moral responsibility” to act because of its history as colonial power in the region.

“It's absolutely clear that Israel-Palestine relations are stuck at an impasse, as is our foreign policy,” Morris said, opening the debate.

“Both of these impasses must be broken. We hear a great deal of talk about the two-state solution but today, through validating both states, members will have the opportunity to translate all of that principled talk into action.“

The vote is non-binding as it was initiated by a backbencher.

Members of the government, which backs a two-state solution, were set to abstain from the vote, Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokesman said.

“We think that... you should do everything you can that's supportive of a successful and sustainable outcome based on a two-state solution,” the spokesman told a regular press briefing earlier.

The leaders of Morris's party, Labour, have said that MPs who are in the Commons when the vote takes place must back it.

Neither Cameron nor Labour leader Ed Miliband was in the Commons chamber for the start of the debate. The debate follows the collapse of peace talks between Israel and Palestine and this year's conflict in Gaza in which more than 2,000 Palestinians and dozens of Israelis were killed.

An online petition paving the way for the debate attracted more than 111,000 signatures, Morris said. Before the debate, a handful of protestors gathered in pouring rain outside the Houses of Parliament, where they had erected a giant banner saying: “Yes Vote for a Palestinian State”.

“If there is a state, the aggression would stop and the healing could begin,” said one of them, Eddie Clarke. “We feel this parliament has a duty to vote for it.”

The Palestinian Authority estimates that 134 countries have recognised Palestine as a state, although the number is disputed and several recognitions by what are now European Union member states date to the Soviet era.

Britain abstained in 2012 from a vote in the United Nations on giving the Palestinians the rank of observer state, which was granted over the objections of the United States and Israel.

Morris sought to persuade lawmakers that statehood for Palestine through negotiation was not the best way forward.

“To make our recognition of Palestine dependent on Israel's agreement would be to grant Israel a veto over Palestinian self-determination,” he said.

But Malcolm Rifkind, Conservative foreign secretary between 1995 and 1997, argued that the Palestinians lacked the basic structures needed for a state due in part to political splits between Hamas and Fatah.

“Recognising a state should only happen when the territory in question has got the basic requirements of a state and through no fault of the Palestinians, that is not true at the moment,” he said.

Rifkind warned that voting for the motion could “make ourselves feel important” while exacerbating existing problems.

Opinion

Farewell Roosevelt Hotel
21 Jan 2021

Farewell Roosevelt Hotel

It is worth noting that massive plans have been upended and assets are now on the verge of being seized.
A horned dilemma
21 Jan 2021

A horned dilemma

Trump would rather ‘reign in Hell, than serve in Heav’n’.
Violence & Afghan peace talks
Updated 20 Jan 2021

Violence & Afghan peace talks

Many of those killed in recent weeks have actively been campaigning against rampant violence and rising human rights violations

Editorial

Updated 21 Jan 2021

Agosta kickbacks trial

A POLITICALLY significant trial opened in Paris yesterday. Former French prime minister Edouard Balladur is in the...
Updated 21 Jan 2021

Indian media scandal

Common sense, factual reporting and ethics are all chucked out the window in the maddening race for ratings, influence and power.
21 Jan 2021

Rising food prices

FOOD inflation continues to challenge the resolve of the government to control the prices of essential kitchen items...
Updated 20 Jan 2021

Broadsheet judgement

There are plenty of skeletons in the Broadsheet cupboard and they must be brought out into the open.
20 Jan 2021

Unequal justice

IT seems no one wants to testify against former SSP Malir, Rao Anwar. At least five prosecution witnesses, all ...
20 Jan 2021

Schools reopening

THE disruptive impact of Covid-19 on education will be felt for years to come. For countries like Pakistan, where...