KHARTOUM: A quarter-century after it took power in an Islamist-backed coup promising “salvation” for Sudan, critics say Field Marshal Omar al-Bashir’s regime has instead destroyed it.

Bashir, 70, is accused of war crimes in the Darfur region and has maintained power despite internal divisions within his ruling National Congress Party (NCP).

He presides over a country where the number of people needing food and other aid rose 40 per cent over the past year and millions have been displaced by the wars and unrest which have touched about half of Sudan’s states.

Sudan is bereft of hard currency, internationally isolated and billions of dollars in debt, ranking near bottom in global measures of human development, perceived corruption and press freedom.

Many of Sudan’s 34 million people live in houses made of mud brick while workers put the final touches to a new presidential palace near the banks of the Blue Nile.

Across from Khartoum’s airport, a tower is rising to house the ruling party — paid for by its members and not public money, says an NCP official.

“They ruined the country,” laments a senior opposition politician. “They divided the country — civil wars, sectarianism, fundamentalism. They impoverished the country — a lot of corruption. So many injustices.”

Bashir took power 25 years ago on the night of June 30, 1989, when paratroops and army engineers overthrew the coalition government of Sadiq al-Mahdi in a bloodless coup.

Mahdi’s government was a rare democratic interlude for a country that had already spent years under military leaders.

But sit-ins, strikes and power outages paralysed the economy during his “totally dysfunctional” rule, Bashir adviser Amin Hassan Omer wrote this month in the pan-Arab newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat.

“It became normal for people to stand in line for bread, fuel and other consumer goods,” putting the country in need of “Ingaz” (salvation), Omer wrote.

Initially, Ingaz offered hope to Sudan’s people, a former high-ranking government official said.

“This is what we had in mind. And I think in a way we proved to them that we could do that,” the former official told AFP, referring to oil and development projects which occurred despite US sanctions that began in 1997.

Roads were built, telecommunications expanded, hospitals and health centres became available, while school and university admissions rose, Bashir’s top assistant Ibrahim Ghandour told AFP in a March interview.

“You can’t eat roads,” counters Siddig Yousif, a member of the opposition Communist Party’s central committee, blaming Ingaz for the decline of Sudanese agriculture.

“They destroyed everything,” he said, citing the decay of Sudan’s rail network, the demise of its shipping line, and the sell-off of the national airline in an atmosphere of “total corruption”.

The start of oil production in the late 1990s brought years of economic growth before the fiscal shock of South Sudan’s separation three years ago.

The South split with 75pc of the country’s oil production, depriving Khartoum of most of its export earnings. As a result, the Sudanese pound has lost around 60pc of its value since late 2011, while inflation has hovered near 40pc for months.

Wealth and power have been concentrated in the country’s central region, leading to complaints among non-Arab groups in the periphery of neglect and discrimination.

From the 11-year-old rebellion in Darfur, to South Kordofan and Blue Nile, and the 22-year civil war which ended in South Sudan’s independence, all of Sudan’s armed conflicts have been fuelled by similar grievances.

“There is war in Darfur. There is war in Blue Nile, in South Kordofan.

What have they done good for the people?” asked University of Khartoum political scientist El Shafie Mohammed El Makki.

Violence against civilians in Darfur led the Hague-based International Criminal Court (ICC) to issue a warrant for Bashir’s arrest on suspicion of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

Many analysts suspect that fear of being turned over to the ICC has helped prolong Bashir’s stay in office.

After the government slashed petrol subsidies in September, thousands took to the streets calling for the government’s overthrow. Dozens were gunned down.

Facing accusations that the country was on the verge of collapse, Bashir appealed in January for a national political dialogue.

Critics say the aim is not real reform but preservation of the regime.

Hassan al-Turabi, a powerful Islamist behind the 1989 coup, broke with Bashir a decade later and founded the opposition Popular Congress Party.

In a 2012 interview, Turabi told AFP that Bashir “never spent five minutes organising the coup” and was put up as a front-man who did not follow through on the Islamists’ programmes for “democratisation” and decentralisation.

“He ignores his own constitution ... He never reads it. He’s a soldier. Soldiers are awful people,” Turabi said.—AFP

Published in Dawn, June 29th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Tough talks
Updated 16 Apr, 2024

Tough talks

The key to unlocking fresh IMF funds lies in convincing the lender that Pakistan is now ready to undertake real reforms.
Caught unawares
Updated 16 Apr, 2024

Caught unawares

The government must prioritise the upgrading of infrastructure to withstand extreme weather.
Going off track
16 Apr, 2024

Going off track

LIKE many other state-owned enterprises in the country, Pakistan Railways is unable to deliver, while haemorrhaging...
Iran’s counterstrike
Updated 15 Apr, 2024

Iran’s counterstrike

Israel, by attacking Iran’s diplomatic facilities and violating Syrian airspace, is largely responsible for this dangerous situation.
Opposition alliance
15 Apr, 2024

Opposition alliance

AFTER the customary Ramazan interlude, political activity has resumed as usual. A ‘grand’ opposition alliance ...
On the margins
15 Apr, 2024

On the margins

IT appears that we are bent upon taking the majoritarian path. Thus, the promise of respect and equality for the...