Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Media under Taliban pressure


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

M. Ziauddin, the executive editor of the Express Tribune, said the Express media group is unsure why it has become a repeated target of the Taliban. — File photo
M. Ziauddin, the executive editor of the Express Tribune, said the Express media group is unsure why it has become a repeated target of the Taliban. — File photo

Away from the cameras and newsprint, a wave of fear and foreboding has swept through the media in recent weeks and months. Last week, in the killing of three Express News employees by the Taliban in Karachi, many of the industry’s fears coalesced bloodily – and few expect the threat to recede.

In a series of conversations with Dawn, senior journalists offered their views on why, at this juncture, the Taliban are trying once again to intimidate the media and also shed some light on the behind-the-scenes pressure that is being brought to bear and that is rarely made public.

“If the focus was on news before, now it’s on views,” Mushtaq Minhas, co-anchor of Bolta Pakistan on Aaj News, said. “(The Taliban) want to dilute the growing state and society narrative against them and want to impose their own narrative.”

Minhas claimed that the growing sophistication of the Taliban’s media operations – both in terms of putting out their own message and closely monitoring the electronic and print media in Urdu, English and regional languages – has meant that the Taliban are alert to growing public and media criticism of the TTP and the possibility of an impending military response by the state against the TTP.

Several journalists, who declined to be named, specifically mentioned Omar Khalid, the TTP Mohmand leader, and the deputy leader of the TTP, Khalid Haqqani, as being especially media-savvy and intent on intimidating the industry.

The public clash of narratives has also exacted a toll behind the scenes. Privately, journalists tell of TV anchors and media bosses who have moved their families abroad or increased private security manifold.

Seated in his office at a distance from its large windows, a small precaution against a potential blast or sniper’s bullet, a senior journalist told of an increase in threatening phone calls and text messages sent by the Taliban – and not just to senior or high-profile media personnel.

“It’s not just us, the faces on TV. They know the personal numbers of in-house employees, the desk in-charges; the people no one outside the organisation or a small circle would know about. Who is giving them these numbers?” the journalist asked, leaving his question unanswered.

As ever, in the murky world of the Taliban and its many offshoots pursuing agendas of their own, it is not always clear why certain media groups and personalities have incurred the Taliban’s wrath.

In some cases, such as Hamid Mir and Hasan Nisar’s, the Taliban’s calculations may be more apparent.

“I’m a target of everyone,” Hamid Mir said ruefully. “That fatwa, with mine and Hasan Nisar’s picture at the top, well, with me they (the Taliban) say that, most recently, I promoted Malala.

And with him (Nisar), it could be the sectarian issue or that he is seen as pro-Musharraf or that he uses strong language.”

But M. Ziauddin, the executive editor of the Express Tribune, said the Express media group is unsure why it has become a repeated target of the Taliban. “The sectarian thing could be a reason.

But the Urdu channel and newspaper coverage is not very different to the other mainstream competition.”

With full and proper explanations yet to be mooted, the vortex of conspiracy has spawned some darker theories about the true origins of the campaign against the media.

“Who does it suit, intimidating the media to give the Taliban narrative more airtime?” a TV news director asked, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “It’s obvious: the establishment.”

The director claimed that a by-product of the media’s growing criticism of the Taliban in Pakistan is that it has affected how the Afghan Taliban are perceived.

“You hear the anchors saying it more and more, ‘Enough of this good Taliban, bad Taliban nonsense,’” he said.

“But it’s 2014 and all eyes will be on Afghanistan, so they need to keep the Taliban narrative alive, to keep it legitimate. They are stakeholders, remember?”

Whatever the true origins of the threat to the media, this much is clear: journalists expect little respite. A newspaper editor said, “My understanding is that (the TTP) intend to make a big impact by targeting a big media house or a leading anchor or editor to assess the reaction.”

The editor continued: “The failure of media houses and journalists to draw up a joint strategy and raise a collective voice goes in the TTP’s favour. It’s only a matter of time before they carry out their first major attack.”

Comments (7) Closed

Irtiza Jan 23, 2014 08:32am

The media sure does seems to be under pressure from Taliban. This can be judged from the fact that Express Tribune does not give option to its readers to give their comments on any news related to taliban/TTP.

BRR Jan 23, 2014 09:35am

The media is a house divided - has been full of pro-Islamic, pro-military journalists until recently who always criticized the governments. Of late this pro-military and pro-Islamic forces media has played safe by not explicitly critiicizing the TTP. However, any attempt to appease them fails when even a hint of criticism appears and the Taliban resort to intimidation. Clearly appeasement has not worked for the media.

Minority Jan 23, 2014 10:01am

Shabash to Talibans who have reached this far while the country's leaders and media is still debating if the solution is dialogue! Act before its too late. You need to learn from Egyptian Army and intelligence (they would love to share their experience) as to how they conducted house by house detailed screening to curtail the brotherhood movement. Pakistan needs more than that as we are dealing with something five times more lethal and incorrigible than the brotherhood. Good luck!

Mustafa Jan 23, 2014 10:55am

I appreciate very much the sincere desire of Cyril Almeida to save Pakistan News Media from the terror of Taliban. However, Cyril Almeida should by now know that there is absolutely no solution to save News Media or anyone in Pakistan from the threat or terror of Taliban except use of force to wipe them out from every city, town, village, tribe and cave. The price is high because there will be many innocent casualties but Pakistan will become a peaceful country for future generation. This is not the time to draw up a joint strategy and raise a collective voice against Taliban. Voice, negotiations, agreements will work with civilized human beings not with inhuman beings,

Samar Jan 23, 2014 06:08pm

Whatever the cost, we should not give in to Taliban. I understand how things change when someone's life is in threat and more importantly their loved ones are in danger. So I hope these people stay strong.

rohit singh Jan 24, 2014 03:50pm

The media has still got the power to mobilize the opinion of the masses against Taliban whether good or bad ( i wonder if there can ever be good Taliban - an american coined term). Action & courage or inaction and fear at this stage will define the future. For a progressive nation, there is a need to look forward and not to let vested interests propel us into stone age. I wish you courage and strength and may the almighty be with you all media people working for a noble cause of development for the human race.

Last Word Jan 25, 2014 06:59pm

Pakistan has a vibrant media who is not afraid to call spade a spade. A fearless and upright media keeps the rulers as well as the law breakers on their tows which always contributes to the progress of any country. The Taliban leadership needs to review its policy of forcing its ideology at the barrel of the gun and refusal to take criticism which it perceives to be a hindrance to their goal. They should read the past history that violent means have never succeeded in changing people's minds and ended up in disaster for those who wanted to implement their ideology by force. The most appropriate example is of emperor Aurangzeb who forcibly tried to convert non-Muslims to Islam but failed miserably despite having lacs of forces under his command and whole of Mughal empire collapsed due to this forcible conversions. If Taliban changes its violent policy and resort to peaceful means, they might be able to impose sharia in Pakistan but the present policy would lead to confrontation with the state and end of their dream since majority of people do not share their views.