Terror in the kingdom

Published
17

Perhaps there could be no greater sign of the dilemma confronting the Muslim world than the terrorist attack on one of the holiest sanctuaries of Islam.

The militants’ message was clear as Saudi Arabia was rocked by three separate, but apparently coordinated, acts of terrorism on Monday, the most shocking being the suicide blast outside the Prophet’s (PBUH) mosque in Madina, in which four security personnel were killed as they tried to prevent the bomber from entering the precincts. In other incidents, a Shia mosque in the eastern town of Qatif was targeted; details are sketchy about that incident, just as there was initial confusion about the Madina blast.

Earlier in the day, a suicide bomber had struck outside the US consulate in Jeddah. News reports suggest the suspect was a Pakistani expatriate.

The three bombings — with the Madina attack invoking particular revulsion — show that the militants can strike with relative ease across the kingdom. No claims have been made, but the militant Islamic State group is suspected of involvement.

Of course, there is a precedent for such violence in Saudi Arabia’s recent history: in 1979, hundreds of Salafi militants — ideologically on the same wavelength as IS — occupied the Masjid al-Haram in Makkah.

That shocking episode ended in a bloody operation as security forces flushed out the militants from the grand mosque.

Clearly, the spirit of the grand mosque assailants has lived on and been reanimated in the form of the modern storm troopers of Islamist militancy.

Monday’s terrorist attacks point to a significant militancy problem in Saudi Arabia. As per official Saudi figures, there have been 26 terrorist attacks over the past two years.

The kingdom had also battled a violent Al Qaeda insurgency over a decade ago. Whether it is IS today or Al Qaeda 12 years ago, or the grand mosque assailants even before that, the fact is that militant movements find willing recruits from within Saudi society.

This is, of course, because for decades, the House of Saud has looked the other way as hard-line clerics have preached a narrow sectarian and confrontational ideology.

For example, clerics in the kingdom have urged young Saudis to go abroad — to Syria, to Iraq — to fight other people’s wars, while the state has allegedly backed militant fighters battling Damascus. Now these radical elements are turning their guns on internal targets.

Pakistan knows the folly of turning a blind eye to radicalism. The Saudis must act now to reverse course, or else considering the deep roots of puritanical elements within the kingdom, more chaos may well be in the pipeline.

Published in Dawn, July 6th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

The debt burden
Updated 07 Nov, 2026

The debt burden

The government borrows to cover consumption, budget deficits, and external payments — not to build anything that pays for itself.
Expendable LGs
07 Nov, 2026

Expendable LGs

POLITICAL parties frequently appear reluctant to hold regular local bodies elections on one pretext or another. This...
Scam centres
07 Nov, 2026

Scam centres

THE recent raid by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency on a dubious call centre in Karachi shows how...
Reviewing ties
Updated 06 Nov, 2026

Reviewing ties

With the Democrats clawing back power in Congress, changes in America’s approach to global engagement are likely to occur.
Genuine engagement
06 Nov, 2026

Genuine engagement

THE PTI-led opposition alliance TTAP appears to have finally brought an initially reluctant Maulana Fazlur Rahman on...
Human bondage
Updated 06 Nov, 2026

Human bondage

Law enforcement and political quarters are notorious for protecting the perpetrators, instead of ensuring legal implementation. Systemic coercion will keep Pakistan from becoming a humane state.