Shafqat Hussain’s case

Published April 26, 2015

In the aftermath of the APS Peshawar carnage, concern has rightly been raised about the state’s all too eager use of the death penalty.

Since December 2014, around 100 executions have taken place in this country. While the lifting of the moratorium on the death penalty was originally justified to tackle cases of terrorism, now convicts are being executed for all capital offences.

And perhaps one of the most controversial cases in which the death sentence has been passed is that of Shafqat Hussain.

Read: Shafqat Hussain to be executed on May 6

On Friday, an antiterrorism court in Karachi issued a black warrant for Hussain’s execution on May 6 for the killing of a minor boy in 2004. His execution had earlier been stayed to determine the convict’s age at the time the crime was committed.

There are clearly far too many doubts in this case that make us question the use of capital punishment — while this newspaper opposes the death penalty under all circumstances. For one thing, human rights groups say the convict was a minor when he allegedly committed the crime. Secondly, Shafqat Hussain has said his confession — apparently the only ‘evidence’ in the case — was obtained through torture.

There are also procedural questions about the case; in light of all these lingering concerns, the argument that the convict should be given the benefit of the doubt and should not be hanged is strengthened.

Also read: FIA inquiry concludes Shafqat ‘wasn’t a minor’

As we cross the grim 100-executions mark, we must ask the state: is Pakistan a safer place now that capital punishment has been resumed? The answer would hardly be in the affirmative. Along with the death penalty’s questionable efficacy in deterring crime and terrorism, we must realise that our criminal justice system is broken, which means there are far too many gaping holes in it to allow the state to take an individual’s life. In such a system, which can be easily manipulated and where justice is both delayed and denied, can executions ever be justified? And while the investigation and prosecution of cases in the civilian justice system is poor, the military courts are opaque and not open for scrutiny. With reportedly the largest death-row population in the world, Pakistan must rethink its approach to criminal justice. While criminals and terrorists must by all means be punished and justice must be served, executions are hardly the ideal method of dispensing it, especially in a system as flawed as ours.

Published in Dawn, April 26th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Holding the line
16 Mar, 2026

Holding the line

PAKISTAN’S long battle against polio has recently produced encouraging signs. Data from the national eradication...
Power self-reliance
Updated 16 Mar, 2026

Power self-reliance

PAKISTAN’S transition to domestic sources of electricity is a welcome development for a country that has long been...
Looking for safety
16 Mar, 2026

Looking for safety

AS the Middle East conflict enters its third week, the war’s most enduring victims are not those who wage it....
Battling hate
Updated 15 Mar, 2026

Battling hate

In the current scenario, geopolitical conflict, racial prejudice and religious bigotry all contribute to the threats Muslims face.
TB drugs shortage
15 Mar, 2026

TB drugs shortage

‘CRIMINAL negligence’ is the phrase that jumps to mind when one considers the disturbing consequences of the...
Chinese diplomacy
Updated 14 Mar, 2026

Chinese diplomacy

THERE are signs that China is taking a more active role in trying to resolve the issue of cross-border terrorism...