ISLAMABAD: The Transparency International Pakistan (TIP) has raised objections to the bidding process of the Privatisation Commission, alleging that ‘Haidermota-BNR’ has been given undue favour for the provision of financial advisory services in several projects with different joint ventures.

In the case of PIA, Haidermota BNR participated in the bidding process for procurement of financial advisory services with two joint ventures. It also submitted bids with two joint ventures in Fesco and bids with three joint ventures in the National Power Construction Company (NPCC).

Haidermota-BNR has consistently been violating PPRA rules and submitting more than one bid with different joint ventures, it alleged.

In a letter to Privatisation Commission Chairman Muhammad Zubair, TIP Chairman Sohail Muzaffar said the company should have been debarred by the PC because under the regulations of the Public Procurement Rules 2004 the standard bidding documents did not allow one bidder to participate in more than one joint venture.

Both joint ventures as per PPRA rules stand disqualified and should not have been allowed to participate in this as well as in future projects of the PC, according to TIP chairman.

Violating the PPRA rules in “appointment of Financial Advisory Services” by the commission might already have made the entire process of privatisation as non-transparent, as one favoured bidder had been awarded four projects in contravention to the rules, he said.


Know more: ‘Dubious’ hiring by Privatisation Commission


“This is to point out that in all joint ventures, all partners have to give commitments that all partners — jointly and severally — will be responsible for performance. A common firm in two joint ventures is also a conflict of interest, and amounts to cartelisation,” Mr Muzaffar said.

TIP urged the PC to scrap all the projects involved and restart the process of appointment of consultants in a transparent manner, and in compliance with the PPRA rules, the evaluation criteria should be given in RFP so that firms of integrity should participate, award the contract as per rules and perform on merit and at the most economical cost.

Published in Dawn, Aug 2nd , 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Removing subsidies
Updated 09 May, 2026

Removing subsidies

The government no longer has the budgetary space to continue carrying hundreds of billions of rupees in untargeted subsidies while the power sector itself remains trapped in circular debt, inefficiencies, theft and under-recovery.
Scarred at home
09 May, 2026

Scarred at home

WHEN homes turn violent towards children, the psychosocial damage is lifelong. In Pakistan, parental violence is...
Zionist zealotry
09 May, 2026

Zionist zealotry

BOTH the Israeli military and far-right citizens of the Zionist state have been involved in appalling hate crimes...
Shifting climate tone
Updated 08 May, 2026

Shifting climate tone

Our financial system is geared towards short-term, risk-averse lending, while climate adaptation and green infrastructure require patient, long-term capital.
Honour and impunity
08 May, 2026

Honour and impunity

THE Sindh Assembly’s discussion on karo-kari this week reminds us of the enduring nature of ‘honour’ killings...
No real change
08 May, 2026

No real change

THE Indian sports ministry’s move to allow Pakistani players and teams to participate in multilateral events ...