Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Abdullah Shah Ghazi

Published Nov 29, 2012 12:10am


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

IN his report, ‘Festival of the Ghazi begins today’ (Nov 6) about Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi, whose shrine is in Clifton, Karachi, your reporter QAM has expressed ignorance about matters relating to Karachi’s patron saint. He has also raised some queries.

For instance, he wonders why people of the metropolis and beyond flock to the Ghazi's tomb. Also, that “Abdullah Shah was not a ‘Sufi’ in the popular sense. He may have been a pious individual descended from a noble clan, but his era predated the rise of the great Sufi orders by a few hundred years ..."

Perhaps he is unaware of the 36 page booklet containing a reasonable amount of information about the wali written and researched by Muhammad Nawaz Tishnah, which is provided free of cost by the admin office located there. It also lists a bibliography of seven reference works at the end.

Briefly speaking, Hazrat Abdullah Shah (98 AH – 151 AH) was the third descendant of Hazrat Imam Husain (R.A.A.), the son of Caliph Ali (R.A.A.).

His father sent him to the latter’s uncle in Basra during the Alawi rebellion, from where he travelled to and settled in Sindh during Caliph Mansoor’s reign, according to Ibn Kathir.

He spent 12 years spreading Islam over there. Following the martyrdom of both his father and paternal uncle during the rebellion against the Abbasids, the governor of Sindh, Umer bin Hafs, was ordered by Caliph Mansoor to arrest Abdullah Shah and send him back.

However, the gentleman held the saint in great esteem, having made bayt (allegiance), finally sending him to the care of a Raja ruling a coastal state.

During his lifetime, he converted hundreds, if not thousands, of people to Islam and finally met his martyrdom at the hands of the newly-appointed governor’s troops.

As far as his relation to Sufism is concerned, the reporter’s conclusion is misleading. The Sufis had existed even during the time of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Some notable examples are those of Hazrat Owais Qarni (R.A.A.), as well as of the group known as the Ashab-i-Suffa.

About the latter, Allah Himself had sent a Quranic verse (VI, 52) in their support and the Prophet (peace be upon him) had also spoken highly of them. So, it can’t be said that Hazrat Abdullah Shah (R.A.) couldn’t have been a Sufi.

S. QADRI Karachi

Comments (6) Closed

Mate Nov 29, 2012 09:09am
I don't think one has to be a Sufi to be respected or to be a saint (with miracles). Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi was a direct descendant of the Prophet SAWS and he was revered because of that and his taqwa and pure and saintly lifestyle. (though it has been heard, that the city of Karachi has never been hit by a cyclone and they are diverted elsewhere when they reach the coast because of him, But Allah knows best) Thank you for the info. Much appreciated.
Hasnain Ahmed Nov 29, 2012 08:42pm
Mr.Qadri Sahib, please send me the book let if u can.I can provide you with my email address. If u realy want to send it to me email me " and I can send you my address and if there is any hadia and postage. to USA.Jazak Allah Khair
karim Nov 29, 2012 07:43pm
Only Allah(SWT) decides where a cyclone goes, noone else. I have also heard this about Abdullah Shah Ghazi shrine but believe it to be a myth.
A-1 Nov 29, 2012 06:02am
From what i've read, i think there is some confusion between "ashab-e-suffa" and "sufi," which are different. The word sufi originated from "suf" or "soof," pertaining to the wollen dress these people wore.
Imran Haider Nov 29, 2012 02:35pm
Qadri sb, How have you linked Suffah with Sufi?
Muhammad Nov 29, 2012 12:56pm
Pakistanis are hero worshippers. They take pride in those who did heroic acts in the past, even centuries ago, as if we are the achievers. Past is history, and should be taken as such for knowledge, not as pride as if we did it. It is a dangrous thinking which can disable us to achieve ourselves.