Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Drone strikes resume amid US-Pakistan strains

Published Jan 12, 2012 04:36am


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

US officials insisted there was no formal decision to suspend drone attacks after the wayward November 26 attack. - Reuters (File Photo)

WASHINGTON: The US resumption of drone strikes against militant targets in Pakistan does not signal an improvement in deeply frayed relations between Washington and Islamabad, US officials and experts said on Wednesday.

In the first such attack since November 17, at least four militants were killed by missiles fired from an unmanned US drone at a house on the outskirts of Miranshah in the Pakistani tribal region of North Waziristan, Pakistani security and intelligence officials said.

Tense US and Pakistani relations worsened after a November 26 incident in which 24 Pakistani troops manning remote border posts were accidentally killed in a misdirected air strike by coalition forces based in Afghanistan.

Current and former US government officials familiar with the drone program said the apparent lull in attacks since the November incident represented no major change in US policy governing drone use.

US officials insisted there was no formal decision to suspend drone attacks after the wayward November 26 attack.

Officials said that while the operating practices of the drone program had evolved over time, the timing of attacks was based on the availability of adequate targeting intelligence and the suitability of flying conditions and did not depend on the ups and downs of the US-Pakistan relationship.

But one former US official who has advised President Barack Obama on policy in the region did not discount the possibility the most recent lull in drone attacks might have been calculated, at least in part, to “cool tempers” in Pakistan following the November incident.

Officials and experts in Washington said the militants targeted in Wednesday's air strike were believed to be “foreign fighters” of Arab and possibly also Uzbek extraction.

None of the militants killed fit the description of “high-value” targets, US sources said, meaning they were not believed to be leaders of al Qaeda, the Taliban or related militant groups.

The CIA has run the US government's drone program in Pakistan as a clandestine operation whose existence US and Pakistani authorities officially deny.

When the program started during President George W. Bush's administration, lethal drone strikes were limited initially to “high-value militant” targets and occurred very infrequently.

In the summer of 2008, Bush secretly authorised a change that significantly expanded possible targets for lethal drone attacks.

Under the new rules, the CIA, if it had appropriate intelligence, was authorised to fire on encampments of “foreign fighters” as well as on “high-value” targets.

Following the rule change, drone strikes in Pakistan's tribal areas became more frequent in the last few months of Bush's presidency.

By most accounts, until US relations with Pakistan began to deteriorate sharply toward the end of 2010, Obama's administration further stepped up the rate of drone strikes.

ADVANCE NOTICE UNLIKELY Current and former US and Pakistani government officials and advisers said it was extremely unlikely that the United States gave Pakistani authorities advance notice of Wednesday's drone strike, although Pakistan may have been notified either at the time of, or shortly after, the attack.

The former Obama adviser said that in every case he knew of before 2007 where the United States gave Pakistan notice of a drone strike; targeted militants fled the target location before the drones hit.

As a consequence, the former official said, Washington stopped giving Islamabad warning of drone strikes, although intelligence officials from the two countries sometimes shared intelligence on possible drone strike targets.

The former official said there was no reason to believe such collaboration occurred in preparing the latest drone attack.

Current and former US officials said that in the wake of the November attack, the United States was forced by Pakistani authorities to evacuate an airstrip in Pakistan it used previously to stage drone operations.

Some officials said the CIA was well-placed to continue drone operations unfettered from other bases - principally believed to be in Afghanistan.

But a former US official said the Pakistan airstrip did provide the United States with backup capability, particularly for operations during the bad weather season beginning in mountainous Afghanistan.

Current and former US officials said many US counter-terrorism experts inside the government believed drone strikes must continue at a fairly regular pace if the United States is to keep al Qaeda and other Pakistan-based militants off balance and prevent them from rebuilding their strength.


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

Comments (8) Closed

Bashir Jan 12, 2012 04:14pm
Only the day-dreamers would have thought drone attacks would not resume.
Rao Jan 12, 2012 06:33pm
Only the drones are effective with their surgical precision attacks resulting in destruction of terrorists. So what do you expect when the house is burning!
Ram Mittal Jan 12, 2012 09:39pm
I don't understand one thing i.e. Pakistan keeps opposing drone attacks and why can't they shoot down the drones? Is the US air force incapable or Pakistan Government has a double standard?
kanwal Jan 12, 2012 10:36pm
What a futile cycle my country is caught in...
Mir Azad Jan 12, 2012 11:13pm
Drone strikes have not and will not make a difference in regards to the Taliban winning.
Mohammad Syed Husain Jan 13, 2012 01:26am
The Government of Pakistan should make it clear to the public where they stand on the continued use of drones of a foreign power in Pakistan through Afghan bases. It is no good that they have accepted this but continue to mislead the people. A clear message will only be sent if further intrusions are treated as hostile and dealt accordingly through the security services. Please don't sit wearing bangles and hoping things will change.
Hashim nizamani Jan 13, 2012 08:35am
If Pakistan wants to stop, she can do it. It's the matter of soveriegnty. Former atacks brought dollars with them, but now all the ties are hanging between the borders. If now Pak goes for interception, America is not in position to start another war. But to go for a bold action, Pak must need to flourish a long term strong strategy.
tf adam Jan 14, 2012 04:05am
All Americans must leave Pakistan and all Pakistanis must leave America!