Narendra Modi
Modi has long been accused by human rights groups of turning a blind eye to the violence, with some suggesting he actively encouraged it. — Photo by Reuters

NEW DELHI: A panel probing anti-Muslim riots in India's Gujarat state in 2002 has strongly criticised the “partisan” handling of the unrest by the state's Hindu nationalist chief minister, Narendra Modi.

The panel, set up by India's Supreme Court, concluded that Modi — a senior Hindu nationalist leader touted as a future prime minister — had sought to play down the seriousness of the violence that claimed 2,000 lives.

However, according to its report, seen by AFP Friday, the panel felt it had not uncovered enough material to justify criminal prosecution.

The Gujarat riots were one of the bloodiest incidents of sectarian violence in India since independence.

Mainly Hindu mobs rampaged through Muslim neighbourhoods for three days, hacking, burning, shooting and beating at least 2,000 Muslims to death.

The unrest was triggered by the death of 59 Hindu pilgrims in a train fire.

The cause of the blaze was never clearly established, but Hindu groups blamed Muslim protesters.

Modi has long been accused by human rights groups of turning a blind eye to the violence, with some suggesting he actively encouraged it.

The findings of the panel appear to substantiate some of the lesser allegations made against Modi and his government, while stopping short of confirming criminal negligence.

“In spite of the fact that ghastly and violent attacks had taken place on Muslims...the reaction of the government was not the type that would have been expected by anyone,” it said.

“The chief minister had tried to water down the seriousness of the situation,” it said, while describing as “sweeping and offensive” Modi's identification of a criminal tendency within Gujarat's Muslim community.

“His implied justification of the killings of innocent members of the minority community, read together with an absence of a strong condemnation of the violence...suggest a partisan stance at a critical juncture,” the panel said.

It also noted Modi's “discriminatory attitude” in not visiting the riot-affected areas in Gujarat's largest city, Ahmedabad.

Opinion

Editorial

Balochistan tragedy
Updated 26 May, 2026

Balochistan tragedy

The state keeps reiterating the role of hostile foreign actors in fomenting unrest, yet seems to be short on ideas on how to prevent the ingress of such actors and their ideologies in Baloch society.
Economic engagement
26 May, 2026

Economic engagement

AN array of investment MoUs valued at $7bn signed during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s China visit signifies...
Flotilla abuse
26 May, 2026

Flotilla abuse

THE testimonies that have emerged from international activists, who were part of a Gaza-bound flotilla, paint a...
In chains
Updated 25 May, 2026

In chains

THE question should never be about who is at the receiving end at any given point in time: an assault on an...
Climate shocks
25 May, 2026

Climate shocks

THE latest State Bank report documenting recurring climatic disasters in Pakistan during the period between 2000 and...
Justice deferred
25 May, 2026

Justice deferred

PAKISTAN’S courts are quick to remind the public that justice takes time. Increasingly, however, it is the conduct...