JUI-F flays ‘poor’ handling of Afghans’ repatriation

Published May 4, 2026 Updated May 4, 2026 09:05am
In this file photo from August 2021, people walk inside a fenced corridor as they enter Pakistan through the border in Chaman. — AFP/File
In this file photo from August 2021, people walk inside a fenced corridor as they enter Pakistan through the border in Chaman. — AFP/File

KHYBER: The Khyber chapter of Jamiat Ulama-i-Islam (F) has expressed reservations over the poor handling of Afghans repatriation via the Torkham border, stating that the current official approach risks turning four decades of goodwill into hostility between the people of the two neighbouring countries.

Addressing a press conference at the district press club Landi Kotal on Sunday, the party local leadership including Mufti Ejaz, Qari Nazeemgul and Muhammad Ahmad Banuri suggested to the provincial government to devise a mechanism which could ensure smooth and dignified return of all the undocumented Afghans.

They said that innocent and helpless Afghans were made to wait for several days at roadside in hostile weather conditions before being allowed to cross the border after undergoing a frustrating procedure of verification and registration in Landi Kotal.

They alleged that the official staff deputed at the transit point was exploiting the miserable condition of the returning Afghans to their personal financial benefits, demanding huge amounts from Afghans for prompt registration and verification.

They said that the prolonged closure of borders with Afghanistan was not only negatively impacting the bilateral trade but had also rendered thousands of people jobless on both sides of the border.

They said that a majority of the jobless people were drifting towards unlawful activities while their families were confronted with serious financial crises.

They said that continuous silence of the provincial government over the plight of affected local people was not only hurting traders and labourers, but it was also a violation of their basic human rights.

Demanding a segregation of bilateral trade from security issues, they insisted that a continuous closure of border and suspension of trade instead of addressing the security issues would further erode mutual trust and confidence between the two countries.

Published in Dawn, May 4th, 2026

Opinion

A long war?

A long war?

Both sides should have a common interest in averting a protracted conflict but the impasse persists.

Editorial

Interlinked crises
Updated 04 May, 2026

Interlinked crises

The situation vis-à-vis the US-Israeli war on Iran remains tense, with hostilities likely to resume if the diplomatic process fails.
Climate readiness
04 May, 2026

Climate readiness

AS policymakers gather for the Breathe Pakistan conference this week, the urgency is hard to miss. Each year, such...
Kalash preservation
04 May, 2026

Kalash preservation

FOR centuries, the Kalash people have maintained a culture, way of life, language and belief system that is uniquely...
On press freedoms
Updated 03 May, 2026

On press freedoms

THE citizenry forgets, to its own peril, how important a free and independent media is in the preservation of their...
Inflation strain
03 May, 2026

Inflation strain

PAKISTAN’S return to double-digit inflation after 21 months signals renewed economic strain where external shocks...
Troubled waters
03 May, 2026

Troubled waters

PAKISTAN’S water crisis is often framed in terms of scarcity. Increasingly, it is also a crisis of contamination....