Anthropic takes US govt to court over ‘security risk’ designation

Published
0
Anthropic logo is seen in this illustration taken on May 20, 2024. — Reuters/File Photo
Anthropic logo is seen in this illustration taken on May 20, 2024. — Reuters/File Photo

WASHINGTON: Anthropic filed suit on Monday against the Trump administration, alleging it retaliated against the AI company for refusing to let its Claude AI model be used for autonomous lethal warfare and mass surveillance of Americans.

In the 48-page complaint, filed in federal court in San Francisco, Anthropic seeks to have its designation as a national security supply-chain risk declared unlawful and blocked.

In its lawsuit, Anthropic said the company was founded on the belief that its AI is “used in a way that maximises positive outcomes for humanity” and should “be the safest and the most responsible”.

“Anthropic brings this suit because the federal government has retaliated against it for expressing that principle,” the lawsuit says.

OpenAI manager resigns to protest Pentagon deal

Anthropic is the first US company ever to have been publicly punished with such a designation, a label typically reserved for organisations from foreign adversary countries, such as Chinese tech giant Huawei.

The designation requires defence vendors and contractors to certify that they do not use Anthropic’s models in their work with the Pentagon.

“The consequences of this case are enormous,” the lawsuit states, with the government “seeking to destroy the economic value created by one of the world’s fastest-growing private companies”.

The dispute erupted after Anthropic infuriated Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth by insisting its technology should not be used for mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons systems.

President Donald Trump ordered every federal agency to cease all use of Anthropic’s technology. Hours later, Hegseth designated Anthropic a “supply-chain risk to national security” and ordered that no military contractor, supplier or partner “may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic”, while allowing a six-month transition period for the Pentagon itself.

The row erupted days before the US military attack against Iran.

Claude is the Pentagon’s most widely deployed frontier AI model and the only such model currently operating on the Department of War’s classified systems.

In its lawsuit, Anthropic argues the actions taken against it violate the First Amendment by punishing the company for protected speech on AI safety policy, exceed the Pentagon’s statutory authority, and deprive it of due process under the Fifth Amendment.

“The Constitution does not allow the government to wield its enormous power to punish a company for its protected speech,” the complaint states.

The company is seeking a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of the designation.

OpenAI manager resigns

A robotics manager at OpenAI said on Saturday that she had resigned over the artificial intelligence giant’s deal with the US government to allow its technology’s deployment for war and domestic surveillance.

The company behind ChatGPT secured a defence contract with the Pentagon last month, hours after rival Anthropic refused to agree to unconditional military use of its technology.

OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman later posted to X saying it would be modifying a contract so its models would not be used for “domestic surveillance of US persons and nationals,” after criticism it was giving too much power to military officials without oversight.

Caitlin Kalinowski, a manager of the hardware team in the robotics division, posted on X that she cared deeply about “the robotics team and the work we built together”.

However, “surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorisation are lines that deserved more deliberation than they got”.

“This was about principle, not people,” she said.

Kalinowski wrote in a follow-up post that she took issue with the haste of OpenAI’s Pentagon deal.

“To be clear, my issue is that the announcement was rushed without the guardrails defined,” she wrote.

“It’s a governance concern first and foremost. These are too important for deals or announcements to be rushed.” Kalinowski previously worked at Meta, developing their augmented reality glasses.

Published in Dawn, March 10th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...