India’s BoP dilemma

Published January 28, 2026

WHILE the Donald Trump-led Board of Peace is not without controversy, mainly because of the US president’s ambitions to create a body that could rival the UN, India faces a different dilemma where joining the board is concerned. Although Mr Trump has extended an invitation to New Delhi, reports indicate that India is “examining” the proposal. The main reason for New Delhi’s dithering, as per the Indian commentariat, may be that it fears that joining the board could lead to ‘unwanted’ attention towards the Kashmir dispute. The US leader has in the past offered his services to mediate the Kashmir question, while he also claimed to have played an integral part in bringing last year’s Pakistan-India hostilities to an end. India, however, remains allergic to third-party interest in occupied Kashmir.

India-US relations have cooled considerably since the US president’s first term. Therefore, if India stays out of the BoP, it would further invite Mr Trump’s wrath, as the American leader does not like to take no for an answer. If it joins, it may face questions about Kashmir, as Donald Trump has indicated the BoP is not just about ending the Gaza slaughter. But beyond the board’s ambitions, this episode reveals more about India’s anxieties regarding held Kashmir. While it is averse to third-party mediation, it has repeatedly rebuffed Pakistan’s attempts to discuss the matter bilaterally. This situation is unsustainable. If matters are left as they are, not only will the Kashmiri people continue to be denied their fundamental rights, but the occupied region will remain a powder keg that can ignite the entire area. Last year’s post-Pahalgam clash clearly illustrates this. India has long been dodging attempts by friendly states to help mediate the Kashmir issue. Yet it has also closed all doors for a bilateral resolution with Pakistan, as well as the representatives of the Kashmiri people. This has resulted in the permanent shadow of conflict over South Asia, while India’s hardened rhetoric has indicated that it is not interested in peace. The people of South Asia deserve better. A thorough peace process is required that can address all outstanding issues, including Kashmir. But for this, India will have to let go of its shibboleths regarding the disputed territory, stop threatening Pakistan’s security, and come to the negotiating table in a spirit of mutual respect.

Published in Dawn, January 28th, 2026

Opinion

A changed world

A changed world

The phrase ‘security provider’ sounds impressive but there is little clarity on what it means for the country.

Editorial

Bannu attack
Updated 12 May, 2026

Bannu attack

The security narrative and strategy of the KP government diverges considerably from the state’s position.
Cotton crisis
12 May, 2026

Cotton crisis

PAKISTAN’S cotton economy is once again facing a crisis that exposes the country’s flawed agricultural and...
Buddhist heritage
12 May, 2026

Buddhist heritage

THE revival of Buddhist chants at the ancient Dharmarajika Stupa in Taxila after nearly 1,500 years is much more ...
New regional order
Updated 11 May, 2026

New regional order

The fact is that the US has only one true security commitment in the Middle East — Israel.
A better start
11 May, 2026

A better start

THE first 1,000 days of a child’s life often shape decades to come. In Pakistan, where chronic malnutrition has...
Widening gap
11 May, 2026

Widening gap

PAKISTAN’S monthly trade deficit ballooned to $4.07bn last month, its highest level since June 2022, further...