Cost of no trade

Published

AS border tensions escalate, Kabul’s decision to terminate all trade with and through Pakistan in the next three months and reroute its imports and exports via Iran, Turkiye and Central Asia is likely to hit Afghanistan hard. But Pakistan will not be insulated from the fallout either. At stake are thousands of low-paid jobs and the survival of numerous small industrial units in KP relying on uninterrupted cross-border commerce with Afghanistan, as well as $1.1bn in export revenue, government tax collection and access to a long-established market next door. It is, therefore, no surprise that business leaders from the province have urged Islamabad to reconsider the weeks-long border closure, which has already inflicted significant losses on traders on both sides and left thousands of cargo trucks stranded at crossings. A media report indicates that Afghanistan is increasingly shifting its freight through Iran’s port of Chabahar, bypassing Pakistan to avoid recurring border and transit disruptions. Kabul’s trade with Iran has already reached $1.6bn — higher than its exchange with Pakistan — underscoring that its decision to halt trade is not merely an act of defiance but a potential strategic realignment.

Islamabad’s concerns over the Afghan Taliban’s refusal to rein in Pakistan-focused militants operating from its soil are genuine and must be addressed. However, a knee-jerk suspension of bilateral trade, without fully weighing its consequences, will not help break the deadlock, and may, in fact, weaken Islamabad’s political leverage over Kabul and endanger its efforts to expand trade links with Central Asia. The recurring unrest at the Pak-Afghan border, and the temporary closures it often triggers, has long been a source of friction in bilateral trade. Yet neither side has previously allowed such disruptions to derail trade flows for so long. This time, however, both countries appear to be moving in a direction that will benefit neither. As a business leader from KP has rightly noted, nations may have political disputes to settle, but they do not stop trading with one another. The growing trade relations between India and China are one example: despite border clashes and deep political mistrust, neither side has ever cut off trade. As a recent report by a brokerage house notes, it is important for both Pakistan and Afghanistan to recognise that “a peaceful trade route is vital for both economies” for development and prosperity.

Published in Dawn, November 17th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

De-escalation efforts
23 Jul, 2026

De-escalation efforts

WHILE the exchange of fire across the Gulf — and the wider Middle East — continues between the US and Iran,...
Time to integrate
23 Jul, 2026

Time to integrate

PAKISTAN remains one of the least regionally integrated economies in Asia. The trade figures for the last fiscal ...
Modi unnerved
23 Jul, 2026

Modi unnerved

DISCONTENT is visible in India. Delhi has been on the boil since last month. As thousands took to the streets ...
Frozen Award
Updated 22 Jul, 2026

Frozen Award

KP’S petition before the Federal Constitutional Court, seeking Rs964bn as the province’s claimed share of tax...
Delayed pricing
22 Jul, 2026

Delayed pricing

THE ongoing delay in making new, approved lifesaving medicines available to patients is a serious lapse in...
Joint prayers
22 Jul, 2026

Joint prayers

IN a country which has witnessed monstrous bouts of sectarian violence, even symbolic gestures by clerics belonging...