ISLAMABAD: Pre­sident Asif Ali Zardari on Saturday formally decla­red Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar the “senior-most judge” of the Islamabad High Court (IHC), following the issuance of a revised seniority list by the Ministry of Law and Justice.

The development follows a ruling by the Supreme Court on June 19 upholding the constitutionality of transferring three judges — including Justice Dogar — from other provincial high courts and referring the matter of seniority determination to the president.

Earlier this year, the law ministry’s transfer of three judges to the IHC had disrupted the seniority list.

On Friday, five IHC judges challenged the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the transfer of three judges — Justice Dogar from the LHC, Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro from the Sindh High Court (SHC), and Justice Muhammad Asif from the Balochistan High Court (BHC).

President Zardari also declared that the status of the transfer of all three judges would be permanent.

The revised listing places Justice Dogar at the top, followed by Justices Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Babar Sattar, Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, Arbab Muhammad Tahir, Saman Rafat Imtiaz, Khadim Hussain Soomro, Muhammad Azam Khan, Muhammad Asif and Inaam Ameen Minhas.

Justice Dogar was sworn in as a judge of the Lahore High Court in June 2015 and then transferred to the IHC onFeb 1.

On Feb 13, he was appointed as the acting chief justice of the IHC amid reservations expressed by some judges over his seniority. The next day, he took oath in a ceremony boycotted by his fellow judges. The lawyer bodies of the federal capital also “rejected” his appointment as the acting chief justice.

All IHC judges were invited, but five of them — Justices Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Babar Sattar, Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan and Saman Rafat Imtiaz — did not attend the ceremony.

On Feb 20, the five judges filed a representation, contending that under the Constitution, a high court judge must take a new oath upon transfer to a different high court, which should affect their seniority ranking.

These judges also filed an intracourt appeal last week seeking a stay on recognising the transferred judges’ seniority and restricting them from performing any IHC duties.

In the Supreme Court’s 3-2 Constitutional Bench majority opinion on June 19, it was held that transfers under Article 200 of the Constitution are constitutionally valid.

The bench — headed by Justice Muhammad Ali Maz­har and comprising Justices Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Sha­hid Bilal Hassan, Salahuddin Panhwar and Shakeel Ahmed — took up petitions filed by five IHC judges, the Karachi Bar Association and the IHC Bar Association, among others.

The bench also clarified that transferred judges retain their seniority as per their original oath and that the president retains authority to resolve inter se ranking.

Published in Dawn, June 30th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...