Proposed agrochemical ban raises concerns

Published
0

LAHORE: The federal government’s proposed ban on 12 key agrochemical active ingredients has sparked concerns in Pakistan’s agricultural sector.

The decision, made in the 62nd APTAC meeting held the other day following the interception of rice export consignments over complaints of higher-than-permitted levels of chemical residue, was taken without consulting stakeholders or following statutory procedures. Industry experts fear this ban will harm crop production, raise costs for farmers, and discourage future investment in Pakistan’s agriculture.

Pakistan’s pesticide regulations clearly stipulate that active ingredients can only be banned based on the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHP) categories 1a and 1b, as well as Annexure III of the Rotterdam Convention.

“This decision appears to be based on non-scientific grounds, lacking consideration of residue management strategies employed by other countries. The issue at hand is not inherently related to the pesticides themselves but rather their misuse or off-label application. Therefore, emphasizing correct usage and handling practices is crucial to mitigating these challenges,” says Rashid Ahmed, executive director of CropLife Pakistan, in a statement.

Addressing pesticide residues in rice exports is crucial, but implementing a blanket ban is a hasty decision that fails to address the underlying problem, he asserts.

He warns that the ban would impact wheat, cotton, fruit, and vegetable growers, leading to reduced yields, increased costs, and potential food security risks due to limited alternatives and accelerated pest resistance.

It will also damage investor confidence in Pakistan’s regulatory environment, he adds.

He says the main problem is improper pesticide use and storage, not the pesticides themselves, as 50 percent of residue issues stem from mishandling in grain storage facilities.

He appeals to the prime minister and the National Food Security & Research Ministry to reconsider the ban and work together on a science-based approach.

Published in Dawn, March 13th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Makkah agreement
Updated 09 Aug, 2026

Makkah agreement

IN the midst of a gruelling war between the US and Iran — currently at a stalemate — the signing of the Makkah...
Conflicting priorities
09 Aug, 2026

Conflicting priorities

THERE is a reasonable argument that the democratic process must go on regardless of prevailing conditions; that...
FIFA controversy
09 Aug, 2026

FIFA controversy

FIFA PRESIDENT Gianni Infantino is at the centre of a storm of his own making. Even after a crisis meeting in...
Danger ahead
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
Israeli impunity
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Flawed investigations
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

An inaccurate record of a victim’s wounds hinders the dispensation of justice. Medical examiners in such a critical area cannot cut corners.