Unfairness in cricket

Published
0

HOPES that cricketing ties between Pakistan and India would be strengthened by the latter team’s visit across the border for the Champions Trophy next year have dimmed. If anything the fracture has worsened. There was some optimism towards the end of the week that a resolution would be reached at the International Cricket Council’s board meeting on Saturday. But a breakthrough remains elusive as the meeting was once again postponed, with the Board of Control for Cricket in India yet to respond conclusively to an offer by the Pakistan Cricket Board to resolve the issue. To ensure that the Champions Trophy goes ahead, the PCB had proposed that matches involving the two bitter rivals in future ICC tournaments in either country be played at a neutral venue after India refused to send its team for the Feb 19 to March 9 competition to Pakistan, which is holding its first major tournament since 1996 when it co-hosted the World Cup.

India had no objections to the security plan for the tournament that was presented by the PCB in October and its refusal comes despite Pakistan having sent its team to India for the World Cup last year. Pakistan did so despite India’s declining to cross the border for the Asia Cup prior to the World Cup and had hoped its gesture would be reciprocated for the Champions Trophy. But the BCCI, which by and large controls the ICC, stuck to its rigid stance. This time, and rightly so, the PCB argued that the case be treated on the basis of equality: the rule-bending for India should also be allowed for Pakistan. For the last several years, Pakistan has proved it is safe for international cricket but India balked when the PCB spoke about equality, claiming that while India itself was safe Pakistan was not — an age-old argument that is based on pure jingoism. Credit must go to the PCB for holding its ground although the impasse shows that a stronger ICC is the need of the hour. Instead of asking the PCB and BCCI to reach a consensus, it should have firmly asked India to play or to opt out. India’s financial muscle does not allow it do that even if the outgoing ICC chairman Greg Barclay hoped his successor Jay Shah, the former BCCI secretary, does not keep the sport “under the yoke of India”. That is the sad reality though.

Published in Dawn, December 8th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Parliament’s place
Updated 11 Oct, 2026

Parliament’s place

In 2015, the parliament had decided to “maintain neutrality in the Yemen conflict so as to be able to play a proactive diplomatic role to end the crisis”.
Disturbing the peace
11 Oct, 2026

Disturbing the peace

THIS year’s Nobel Peace Prize is well-earned. The winner, South African jurist Dr Navi Pillay, has had an...
A voice in care
10 Oct, 2026

A voice in care

WORLD Mental Health Day this year carries a compelling message. The theme, ‘Lived experiences heard: real voices,...
Midterm break
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

Midterm break

Both the US and Israel need to halt their destructive misadventures in the Middle East.
American barbarism
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

American barbarism

WITH the spectre of defeat in the upcoming midterm elections looming large over the Trump administration, the...