PESHAWAR: The police’s raid on a Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement camp in Khyber tribal district has triggered a controversy, with both the provincial and federal governments holding each other responsible for it.

The Khyber police set fire to a PTM camp, established for holding the Oct 11 jirga Awami Adalat, during multiple raids on Tuesday and Wednesday.

The PTM activists insisted that the camp was raided by Peshawar and Khyber police’s officials, who uprooted tents and took away goods amid intense tear gas shelling and firing in the air.

Senior government officials told Dawn that a letter was issued by the home department to the provincial police chief for ‘necessary action’ in line with the orders of the interior ministry for Khyber police action against the PTM, the provincial government distanced itself from the raids.

CM adviser Saif insists chief secy acted on orders of interior ministry

Adviser to the chief minister on information and public relations Barrister Mohammad Ali Saif told Dawn that the police carried out raids after the provincial chief secretary “directly” received orders from the federal government.

He added that the chief secretary later ordered the police action.

“The chief secretary directly received orders from the interior ministry before the police acted against the PTM under Section 11 of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997,” he said.

The aide to the CM said that it was beyond the provincial government’s jurisdiction to take action against the chief secretary and police for “bypassing” the provincial government.

He said that if the federal government was not involved in the police action against PTM, why the interior ministry sent in the deputy attorney general for Pakistan to appear before the high court in the case filed by the PTM against those raids.

“I say it again that the police took action and followed the law, but all that was done on the orders issued by the federal government,” he said.

On the other hand, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi questioned the need for the police’s crackdown on PTM and wondered if Islamabad police took action inside Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

“On one hand, you insist that the federal government ordered a crackdown [on PTM], but on the other, you say it was Peshawar’s police that took action. First clear yourself about it,” Mr Naqvi told reporters in Islamabad.

The minister said that the question about the Khyber action should be put to Peshawar police and not him.

He emphasised that the Peshawar police didn’t act on the orders of the interior ministry.

Published in Dawn, October 5th, 2024

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.