LAHORE: The Advocate General of Punjab (AGP), Khalid Ishaq, on Thursday told the Lahore High Court that no proceedings had so far been started under the Defamation Act 2024.

Opposing the petitions against the law, he said the petitioners were merely speculating that something was about to happen, but no action had been taken under the law yet. He clarified that neither tribunals had been formed nor rules established under the law.

Justice Amjad Rafiq asked the law officer what would happen if someone committed an offence from Sindh or other provinces.

AGP Ishaq said the answer to this question was under discussion in the Supreme Court. He further said that it would be a different matter if an aggrieved person moves the court to stop the proceedings. However, he said, no aggrieved party had so far filed a petition.

Justice Amjad Rafiq observed that it was not necessary that only an aggrieved person could challenge a law made in violation of fundamental rights.

The judge remarked that serious questions had been raised by the petitioners on the defamation law.

The judge adjourned further proceedings on the petitions till July 29.

Lahore Press Club President Arshad Ansari, among others, has challenged the new law.

The judge also issued notices to the government on a fresh petition filed by journalists Benazir Shah and Mansoor Ali Khan.

After going through the petitions by the two journalists, Justice Rafiq observed that there were good grounds to assess the constitutionality of the law.

The two journalists challenged the law mainly on the ground that the core subject matter of the legislation is communication or speech, which is beyond the legislative competence of provinces.

The petitioners also assailed the law on the grounds for being in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

The petitioners argued that the provisions of the law are extremely harsh and punitive in nature, which place unreasonable restrictions on freedom of speech and expression violating rights of due process and equality.

They asked the court to issue a stay order against the operation of the Defamation Act and declare that the law is void ab initio, of no legal effect and ultra vires of the Constitution.

Published in Dawn, July 5th, 2024

Opinion

In fight mode

In fight mode

The bouts between political parties and establishment take a toll on country far more than they do on political parties.

Editorial

Meltdown
08 Apr, 2025

Meltdown

A full-blown trade war is upon us as the era of the rules-based, multilateral trading order is nearly over.
Settling differences
08 Apr, 2025

Settling differences

SOMETHING is stirring within the PTI. Some of its older hands are back in the limelight, ostensibly to make another...
Glacial ingenuity
08 Apr, 2025

Glacial ingenuity

NECESSITY is indeed the mother of invention, as witnessed in Gilgit-Baltistan. In these areas, where climate change...
Going dry
Updated 07 Apr, 2025

Going dry

Authorities should refrain from undertaking any water scheme that infringes on rights of any federating unit to avoid more controversies.
Afghan return
07 Apr, 2025

Afghan return

AS expected, the government of Pakistan is moving ahead with its plan to forcibly repatriate Afghan Citizenship Card...
Hurting women
07 Apr, 2025

Hurting women

MONTH after month, the figures of crimes against women in the country indicate that our society is close to...