THIS is with reference to the report “Body to regulate ‘unbridled’ social media set up” (May 4), which talked about the federal government’s notification of a day earlier, constituting the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) to deal with offences related to cybersecurity. With this development, the Cybercrime Wing of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) now stands defunct.

Though the notification cited section 51 of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca), 2016, as a legal authority behind the move, there are many legal lacunas that speak volumes of procedural mishaps, and the haste that was shown by the government in making the announcement.

First, Peca section 51 does not authorise the federal government to dissolve any existing wing of the FIA, and constituting a whole new one to replace it.

Second, the section specifically vests in the government the power of rulemaking for carrying out the purposes of Peca. This rulemaking may range from specifying powers as well as responsibilities of the investigation agency to the appointment of the designated agency having enough proven capability to collect real-time information.

However, in the latest move, neither a single rule was made in the context of section 51 nor the establishment of NCCIA can fall into ‘the appointment of designated agency’ part. Appointing an agency is quite different from establishing an agency. Even the currently dissolved Cybercrime Wing of FIA was ‘guided’, not ‘established’, under Peca.

Moreover, the sole authority behind the formation of FIA, including all its wings, is the FIA Act of 1974, not Peca 2016. As such, the latter introduced modern offences to be dealt with by the investigation agency that was already existent and operational at the time. Since no prior legislation was passed by parliament, the establishment of NCCIA is, therefore, a step outside the powers of the federal government, and an action that has been taken beyond the law. Therefore, all the relevant stakeholders, including the higher judiciary, must take due action so that the supremacy of the law of the land may be established.

Minahil Saleem
Hyderabad

Published in Dawn, May 15th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Out of control
Updated 19 Feb, 2025

Out of control

AS bodies continue to fall in Kurram despite a state-sanctioned ceasefire, one wonders how long local militants’...
Hollow words
19 Feb, 2025

Hollow words

IT is not uncommon for politicians to resort to the use of hyperbole in order to boost their public standing. ...
Migration matters
19 Feb, 2025

Migration matters

THE grass, it seems, did appear greener on the other side to millions of people as evidenced by the latest UN ...
Cholistan project
Updated 18 Feb, 2025

Cholistan project

GPI goals align with Pakistan's broader economic aims but the manner in which the initiative was launched raises questions.
Right to know
18 Feb, 2025

Right to know

IT is an unfortunate paradox that while on paper Pakistan has some of the most impressive right to information laws,...
Dam dispute
18 Feb, 2025

Dam dispute

THE situation in Chilas needs attention and a fair-minded approach so that it can be resolved amicably. Diamer ...