Our rights wronged

Published April 25, 2024
The writer is an author.
The writer is an author.

DEAD men do not write autobiographies. Someone in time will breathe life into their past.

The first 12 Roman caesars — starting with Julius Caesar — had the historian Suetonius. Dr Samuel Johnson had his James Boswell. Steve Jobs (the cofounder of Apple) had Walter Isaacson. M.A. Jinnah began with Hector Bolitho. M.K. Gandhi had himself.

In the US, Malcolm X (the leader of the Black empowerment movement and within it a promoter of Islam) collaborated with the author Alex Haley (of Roots fame) on his memoir. Haley culled it from 50 or so in-depth interviews he conducted over two years with Malcolm X. It appeared in 1965 after Malcolm X’s assassination, as The Autobiography of Malcolm X.

Malcolm X died a critic of Dr Martin Luther King Jr. He opposed King’s emphasis on racial integration and Gandhian nonviolence. King believed: “The choice is either nonviolence or nonexistence.” Three years later, in 1968, Martin Luther King was murdered by a white supremacist in Memphis.

Clayborne’s book contains nuggets of inspiration.

There, he had made a speech hauntingly prescient: “Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its place. But I’m not concerned about that now. I just want to do God’s will. And He’s allowed me to go up to the mountain [.] And I’ve seen the Promised Land.”

King died months short of his 40th birthday. After his death, his widow Coretta Scott King invited Clayborne Carson — a historian at Stanford University — to write about him. Clayborne used King’s “published books, speeches, sermons, letters, and unpublished manuscripts” to produce “the autobiography that King might have written had his life not suddenly ended”.

If King had lived his full span, he would have been exactly 80 years old when Barack Obama was sworn in as the US’s first Black president in 2009. King’s dream that persons should be judged “not by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character” became a reality. All that remains now is for the US to elect a transgender Latino president.

Clayborne’s largely forgotten book contains many nuggets of inspiration which deserve to be recalled, especially here in Pakistan where we have no Blacks or Harijans but a privileged caste of ‘untouchables’. He quotes a comment by the Ghanaian leader, Kwame Nkrumah: “I prefer self-government with danger to servitude with tranquillity.” And another by M.K. Gandhi: “No one can ride on the back of a man, unless it is bent.”

When John F. Kennedy was shot in 1961, Dr King did not ask who killed Kennedy, but what killed him. Many in today’s unstable world would agree with Dr King’s explanation that Kennedy was assassinated by “a morally inclement climate [,] a climate filled with heavy torrents of false accusation, jostling winds of hatred, and raging storms of violence. It is a climate where men cannot disagree without being disagreeable, and where they express dissent through violence and murder”.

Dr King, within two months of receiving the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize from the Norwegian monarch in Oslo, found himself back in a US jail. The Mughal emperor Aurangzeb foresaw such fickleness of fortune in his aphorism: ‘Takht, ya takhta’ (either the throne, or the mortician’s slab).

Dr King, in one of his early addresses, justified his demand for racial equivalence, saying: “We are not wrong in what we are doing. If we are wrong, the supreme court is wrong. If we are wrong, the constitution is wrong.” And then, echoing Allama Iqbal’s famous remonstrance in his Shikwa and Jawab-i-Shikwa: “If we are wrong, [divinity] is wrong.”

Pakistanis are not wrong in loving their country, even though they often despise its various governments. Nor are they mistaken in respecting their 1973 Constitution, despite its appendage of 34 subsequent amendments.

They felt a pang of shame, therefore, at watching our second-term president address the joint Houses of Parliament on April 18. Absent were the chief ministers of two major provinces (Punjab and KP). The president, as our constitutional head of state, represents the unity of all the components of our republic, however mismatched. Whatever a CM’s party affiliation, it is subordinate to constitutional dictates.

Similarly, the seats reserved for all the military chiefs were empty. They declined to hear the address of their own commander-in-chief.

The preamble to our 1973 Constitution begins with this lofty exhortation: “Whereas sovereignty over the entire Universe belongs to Almighty Allah alone, and the authority to be exercised by the people of Pakistan within the limits prescribed by Him is a sacred trust.”

Obviously, something has gone wrong since then. Almighty Allah cannot be wrong. So either our Constitution is wrong, or some of us are.

The writer is an author.

www.fsaijazuddin.pk

Published in Dawn, April 25th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Debt trap
Updated 30 May, 2024

Debt trap

The task before the government is to boost its tax-to-GDP ratio to the global average by taxing the economy’s untaxed and undertaxed sectors.
Foregone times
30 May, 2024

Foregone times

THE past, as they say, is a foreign country. It seems that the PML-N’s leadership has chosen to live there. Nawaz...
Margalla fires
30 May, 2024

Margalla fires

THE Margalla Hills — the sprawling 12,605-hectare national park — were once again engulfed in flames, with 15...
First steps
Updated 29 May, 2024

First steps

One hopes that this small change will pave the way for bigger things.
Rafah inferno
29 May, 2024

Rafah inferno

THE level of barbarity witnessed in Sunday’s Israeli air strike targeting a refugee camp in Rafah is shocking even...
On a whim
29 May, 2024

On a whim

THE sudden declaration of May 28 as a public holiday to observe Youm-i-Takbeer — the anniversary of Pakistan’s...