Nepra’s reluctance

Published February 26, 2024

WHAT is the point in having a regulator that does not punish the entities it oversees for misconduct and transgressions, and that is unable to protect the consumers? It is distressing to watch the power sector regulator Nepra let Discos and K-Electric off the hook, without even issuing show-cause notices, let alone penalising them, for overcharging their unsuspecting consumers in July-August to show higher bill recoveries. Only a week ago, the regulator announced at a public hearing that it was dissatisfied with the Disco’s response to the excessive billing charges and would hold them accountable. It also declared that it had decided to issue formal show-cause notices to them. What changed Nepra’s mind between then and now remains a secret. Why it let the power distribution companies get away with this offence is hard to comprehend. Nepra has only asked them to ‘compensate their consumers’ through the upcoming bills to the extent of the additional burden — even though overbilling by Discos/ K-E, in the regulator’s own words, violates the provisions of the Nepra Act.

The inexplicable reluctance of the regulator to punish the power distributors has also made the ongoing ‘recovery campaign’ against defaulters and power thieves suspect, besides calling into question the integrity of the revenue streams of the Discos/ K-E, from meter-reading to billing, and faulty meters to penalties and the recoveries imposed by them. The biggest reputational hit is taken by Nepra itself, with power consumers questioning the very reason for its existence. Consumer complaints about overbilling by Discos are not uncommon. However, it was the massive scale of such complaints last summer that brought inflation-stricken consumers onto the streets in several cities and forced Nepra to take note of the practice. Its failure to take action against this illegal practice will only embolden the power entities further. If power consumers were to again suffer overbilling this year, the onus would be on the regulator itself.

Published in Dawn, February 26th, 2024

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...