Fitch’s concern

Published
0

AS political parties scramble to form a potentially weak coalition at the centre, the uncertainty unleashed by the inconclusive outcome of the Feb 8 polls is giving Pakistan’s creditors and investors the jitters.

This nervousness stems from widespread doubts over the incoming government’s ability to quickly negotiate a new and larger bailout with the IMF to succeed the ongoing interim package ending soon, and adhere to tougher policy commitments under it.

This is in spite of a strong political consensus within the country on the need for yet another IMF programme and wide structural reforms considered critical for Pakistan’s longer-term economic trajectory. The deal is also crucial for Pakistan to secure financing flows from other multilateral, bilateral and commercial creditors.

These concerns were recently voiced by Moody’s in its post-poll comments on Pakistan’s macroeconomic vulnerabilities. Now Fitch Ratings has expressed its disquiet over the volatile political conditions obtaining in the country in the absence of a clear public mandate: “Finalising a new IMF deal is likely to be challenging.”

Pointing to the election outcome, it warns that “near-term political uncertainty may complicate the country’s efforts to secure a financing agreement with the IMF to succeed the Stand-by Arrangement”.

Fitch assumes that the new government will engage with the IMF relatively quickly and overcome any resistance to the new loan goals by vested interests, given the worrying nature of the economic challenges and the limited options, yet it fears that continued political volatility could prolong any discussions with the IMF and hamper the implementation of reforms. “Risks to political stability are likely to remain high. Public discontent could rise further…,” it cautions.

That creditors and investors are worried about political uncertainty and possible delays in concluding a new IMF deal is not without reason. Our politicians are known for changing their stated position on crucial economic and other policy matters when in the opposition.

Even past governments have pulled out of financial deals, when faced with political backlash. However, politicking over a new deal and the reforms mandated by it is no longer an option for Pakistan.

As underscored by Fitch, extended negotiation or failure to secure a commitment would increase external liquidity stress and raise the possibility of default. If that happens the blame would rest with those who scuppered the deal.

Published in Dawn, February 21st, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...