LAHORE: The Pakistan Elec­tronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) told the Lahore High Court on Thursday there was no ban on media coverage of jailed PTI founding chairman Imran Khan.

Pemra’s counsel Harron Duggal stated this during the hearing of a petition of former prime minister Imran Khan questioning alleged violation of a stay order against the ban on media coverage of his speeches.

The petition was filed before Mr Khan’s arrest in the Toshakhana case.

Pemra’s lawyer also said the authority would comply with the directions of the court.

Justice Shams Mahmood Mirza disposed of the petition with an observation that appropriate directions would be issued to Pemra, in a detailed verdict, to ensure a level playing field is given to all political parties regarding broadcasting of their content and speeches in media.

The judge said that directions would also be issued to news channels not to create any hindrance for any particular party regarding transmission of their content and politico-economic agenda.

On behalf of the federation, Assistant Attorney General Sheraz Zaka said similar standards must be followed by the LHC which have been set by the Supreme Court in the Faizabad sit-in case regarding imposition of the ban on speeches of Khadim Husain Rizvi.

Mr Zaka asserted the petitioner (Imran Khan) was involved in making hateful speeches against the armed forces of the country.

He said the court must strike a balance between maintenance of public order and freedom of speech as fundamental rights were not absolute but subject to a law.

Justice Mirza observed that times have changed and in this era of social media where everyone has technology gadgets, such a ban on freedom of speech is a futile exercise.

He said that elections are around the corner and, therefore, all political parties must be given freedom to communicate and advance their agenda to the masses.

Advocate Ahmad Pansota, who represented petitioner Imran Khan, said the government has violated a court’s order and banned coverage of Mr Khan in the media.

The lawyer said that the government also jailed the former prime minister besides silencing his voice in media.

Published in Dawn, January 5th, 2024

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...