Torkham closure

Published
0

THE weeklong closure of the Torkham crossing between Pakistan and Afghanistan has had a detrimental effect on bilateral relations, with trade ties particularly affected, while causing considerable human misery to those wishing to cross the border. Trouble started on Sept 6 when both sides traded fire.

According to authorities here, the Afghans had started building an “unlawful structure” on Pakistani territory, while Afghan troops resorted to “indiscriminate firing” when they were confronted over the disputed construction.

Meetings between officials from both sides have failed to resolve the dispute, with the result that hundreds of vehicles remain stranded, waiting to go across the border, while people wishing to get to the other side have also been left high and dry.

The cost of the closure has reportedly resulted in losses worth hundreds of millions of rupees, with perishable items — including fruit and vegetables from Afghanistan — not getting to market and rotting in the hot weather.

Comments made by the Taliban-led regime in Kabul taking a swipe at Pakistan’s economic troubles have certainly not helped cool tempers, as the Afghan side referred to Pakistan “being heavily dependent … on exports in the current situation”. The Foreign Office has been critical of the Taliban’s ‘unsolicited advice’.

Friction has occurred at the Torkham border in the past as well; the fact is that territorial disputes between Pakistan and Afghanistan date back to the time of this country’s independence.

However, the Afghan Taliban need to be mindful of Pakistan’s sensitivities, and refrain from construction activities on disputed territory. Higher-level exchanges are required to properly demarcate disputed border regions, so that these irritants are permanently addressed.

Moreover, traders and the general public on both sides are suffering from the extended border closure, which is why officials from Islamabad and Kabul need to reopen the crossing as soon as possible.

Torkham is a key conduit in Afghan transit trade, but Pakistan’s security concerns, as well as respect for this country’s territorial sovereignty, must be addressed by Kabul’s rulers to ensure cross-border economic activities continue smoothly.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s desire to establish strong trade and energy linkages with Central Asia cannot be fulfilled unless there is a cordial relationship with and security guarantees from Kabul. Trade through official channels is a mutually beneficial proposition, but only if there is conflict-free border management.

Published in Dawn, September 13th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Lagging behind
Updated 15 Oct, 2026

Lagging behind

The immediate task is to contain inflation and protect vulnerable households without reviving unsustainable subsidies or excessive demand.
India voter purge
Updated 15 Oct, 2026

India voter purge

Earlier, the BJP and its Hindutva cohorts could get away with trampling the rights of Indian Muslims, but now their shenanigans are not working.
Multan derailment
15 Oct, 2026

Multan derailment

IN numerous states, including many of Pakistan’s neighbours, rail transport is a safe and affordable mode of...
Narrative confusion
Updated 14 Oct, 2026

Narrative confusion

The centre must say clearly how long it intends it to last, what it hopes to achieve in that time, and how the province’s elected mandate will be restored.
El Niño’s long reach
14 Oct, 2026

El Niño’s long reach

THE extraordinary El Niño gathering strength in the Pacific could make 2026 the hottest year on record, with 2027...
Deeper poverty
Updated 14 Oct, 2026

Deeper poverty

PAKISTAN’S poverty crisis is far deeper than official indicators suggest. While the government celebrates economic...