LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Friday disposed of writ petitions of former prime minister Imran Khan seeking quashing of cases against him and permission to attend the proceedings through a video-link facility.

Barrister Salman Safdar, on behalf of Mr Khan, asked the LHC larger bench to pass a stay order against the arrest of the petitioner. He said the caretaker government of Punjab had registered politically motivated cases against the PTI chairman.

He said on each occasion of his (petitioner’s) appearance before a judicial forum, there was a serious threat to his life due to lack of security being provided to him despite his entitlement as a former prime minister.

The counsel said that permitting the petitioner to appear through video link would be cost-effective and viable for the administration of the criminal justice system as there would be no need to deploy thousands of security officials on the occasion of his court appearance.

Rejects petitions of Elahi and Buzdar seeking details of cases against them

Additional Advocate General Ghulam Sarwar Nihang opposed the petition and told the bench that Mr Khan filed a similar petition before the Supreme Court.

Referring to the Supreme Court’s order against the arrest of Mr Khan, he said an unprecedented relief was being granted to the PTI chief by the courts.

Justice Ali Baqar Najafi, who headed the bench, interrupted the law officer and cautioned him against commenting on the apex court’s orders.

Barrister Safdar said he was not seeking any relief but the protection of fundamental rights.

After hearing both sides, the bench reserved the verdict.

Later, the bench issued a written short order disposing of the two petitions of the PTI chief.

Justice Aalia Neelum, Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh, Justice Anwarul Haq Pannun and Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq were the other members of the bench.

The larger bench also disposed of the petitions of former chief ministers Parvez Elahi and Usman Buzdar seeking details of the cases against them.

Published in Dawn, May 27th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

What now?
20 Sep, 2024

What now?

Govt's actions could turn the reserved seats verdict into a major clash between institutions. It is a risky and unfortunate escalation.
IHK election farce
20 Sep, 2024

IHK election farce

WHILE India will be keen to trumpet the holding of elections in held Kashmir as a return to ‘normalcy’, things...
Donating organs
20 Sep, 2024

Donating organs

CERTAIN philanthropic practices require a more scientific temperament than ours to flourish. Deceased organ donation...
Lingering concerns
19 Sep, 2024

Lingering concerns

Embarrassed after failing to muster numbers during the high-stakes drama that played out all weekend, the govt will need time to regroup.
Pager explosions
Updated 19 Sep, 2024

Pager explosions

This dangerous brinkmanship is likely to drag the region — and the global economy — into a vortex of violence and instability.
Losing to China
19 Sep, 2024

Losing to China

AT a time when they should have stepped up, a sense of complacency seemed to have descended on the Pakistan hockey...