Needless turmoil

Published April 8, 2023

THE constitutional prescription for elections within 90 days of the dissolution of assemblies may be ill-suited to the PDM coalition’s interests, but the government — any government — has no choice but to kneel before the law.

The recent campaign launched by the PML-N-led government and its allied parties to provoke a confrontation both with and within the judiciary — a confrontation they have sought to justify on the basis of what seems to be a gross misunderstanding of the legislature’s role within the state — is unlikely to end well for the country or any of the parties involved.

These parties and their leaders seem to have committed themselves to a very dangerous path under the assumption that their actions will ultimately be endorsed by a segment of the judiciary that they see as ‘sympathetic’ to their political cause.

However, they would do well to keep in mind that the judiciary is, ultimately, an independent institution with a mind of its own.

Although it is difficult to comment too deeply on the matter given how secluded the judiciary has traditionally been from the public eye, it can be safely said that the differences between our senior judges are older and rooted in something much bigger than the current political stand-off.

For example, the rightful objections to the non-inclusion of the senior puisne judge in benches hearing important cases is, unfortunately, not a recent development nor one that concerns recent cases only.

Likewise, the debate over curtailing the chief justice’s suo motu powers, as well as his discretionary power over bench formation, has been ongoing for years. Yes, these issues have recently spilt into public view in rather messy ways, but that should not be taken to mean that the judges’ positions on their internal matters are somehow indicative of their ‘political leanings’ as well.

Therefore, the politicians who are taking cover behind the judiciary’s internal turmoil to ‘reject’ the Supreme Court’s judgement in the elections delay case should, perhaps, not throw both sense and restraint out of the window.

It bears pointing out that even within the legal community, there appears to be very little disagreement on the fact that the Constitution clearly specifies that elections do need to be called within 90 days of the dissolution of an assembly.

Therefore, while the manner in which the Supreme Court ruled on the matter may be controversial, there is no escaping its conclusion. Unless the government deliberately wishes to undermine the trichotomy of powers within the state, it should drop its resistance and allow the Election Commission to proceed as directed.

The PDM parties may not fancy their electoral chances given the current environment, but that does not mean they have free rein to pack up the political process and sabotage the state to protect themselves.

Published in Dawn, April 8th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Debt trap
Updated 30 May, 2024

Debt trap

The task before the government is to boost its tax-to-GDP ratio to the global average by taxing the economy’s untaxed and undertaxed sectors.
Foregone times
30 May, 2024

Foregone times

THE past, as they say, is a foreign country. It seems that the PML-N’s leadership has chosen to live there. Nawaz...
Margalla fires
30 May, 2024

Margalla fires

THE Margalla Hills — the sprawling 12,605-hectare national park — were once again engulfed in flames, with 15...
First steps
Updated 29 May, 2024

First steps

One hopes that this small change will pave the way for bigger things.
Rafah inferno
29 May, 2024

Rafah inferno

THE level of barbarity witnessed in Sunday’s Israeli air strike targeting a refugee camp in Rafah is shocking even...
On a whim
29 May, 2024

On a whim

THE sudden declaration of May 28 as a public holiday to observe Youm-i-Takbeer — the anniversary of Pakistan’s...