Many questions

Published
34

TWO months after the failed assassination attempt against former prime minister Imran Khan, all we have is more questions.

It has recently come to light that the joint investigation team formed by the Punjab government to probe the deadly bid on Mr Khan’s life has found evidence of a larger conspiracy; meanwhile, the federal government has also doubled down on its stance that the attack was the work of a lone wolf acting on his religious beliefs.

It is difficult to determine who to believe, as there are ample holes in both narratives as well as the JIT’s report.

All sides appear to have been selective with the facts, with the result being that we are no closer to getting to the bottom of the matter than we were in November.

The haphazard way in which matters were handled in the immediate aftermath of the attack had all but precluded the possibility of an impartial and accurate investigation.

It was strange that the prime suspect’s alleged ‘confession’ was recorded — apparently on a senior police officer’s direction — and quickly leaked to national media well before any investigation of the incident. Then, as Mr Khan has once again pointed out, he was never allowed to lodge an FIR against the powerful individuals he suspected.

On the flipside, Mr Khan never joined the investigation or shared any proof to back the accusations he had made, and continues to make, against the prime minister, interior minister and “black sheep” in the military.

The inquiry was also conducted by a team handpicked by the Punjab government, and therefore appeared to lack the important element of impartiality.

Its reported findings, that none of the former prime minister’s guards discharged their weapons, and that bullets were fired by three different assassins from three different directions, are quite surprising as they seemingly contradict the contents of various video recordings of the attack which had circulated widely after it took place. Reports that the prime suspect failed a polygraph test are also quite concerning.

Clearly, both sides are being less than forthright and the truth is very likely quite different than what either would like to admit. It is extremely important that their distrust of each other is kept aside and we have an unimpeachable version of events. Only that can allow the prosecution of this dastardly attack.

An assassination bid against a major public leader is no trivial matter. Too many Pakistanis have paid with their lives while pursuing their vision for the country.

It is a grave tragedy that the ones who were slain never received justice, nor their families and followers any closure, just because their cases were never honestly investigated or prosecuted by the state.

The political leadership on both sides would be well advised to stop creating hurdles. Whatever the truth of the matter, it must come out.

Published in Dawn, January 7th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Parliament’s place
Updated 11 Oct, 2026

Parliament’s place

In 2015, the parliament had decided to “maintain neutrality in the Yemen conflict so as to be able to play a proactive diplomatic role to end the crisis”.
Disturbing the peace
11 Oct, 2026

Disturbing the peace

THIS year’s Nobel Peace Prize is well-earned. The winner, South African jurist Dr Navi Pillay, has had an...
A voice in care
10 Oct, 2026

A voice in care

WORLD Mental Health Day this year carries a compelling message. The theme, ‘Lived experiences heard: real voices,...
Midterm break
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

Midterm break

Both the US and Israel need to halt their destructive misadventures in the Middle East.
American barbarism
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

American barbarism

WITH the spectre of defeat in the upcoming midterm elections looming large over the Trump administration, the...