Imran appears before Islamabad court to apologise to Judge Zeba Chaudhry in person

Published September 30, 2022
<p>PTI chief Imran Khan arrives at Islamabad sessions court on Friday. — Still from video posted by <a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="link--external" href="https://twitter.com/PTIofficial">@PTIofficial</a> on Twitter</p>

PTI chief Imran Khan arrives at Islamabad sessions court on Friday. — Still from video posted by @PTIofficial on Twitter

<p>PTI chief Imran Khan arrives at Islamabad sessions court on Friday. — DawnNewsTV</p>

PTI chief Imran Khan arrives at Islamabad sessions court on Friday. — DawnNewsTV

PTI chief Imran Khan on Friday appeared before an Islamabad sessions court to personally apologise to Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Zeba Chaudhry.

Last month, the Islamabad High Court had initiated contempt proceedings against Imran over his diatribe against Judge Chaudhry — who had approved PTI leader Shahbaz Gill’s physical remand in a sedition case — at a public rally in Islamabad’s F-9 Park on Aug 20.

Earlier this month, the IHC had said it would indict the former premier, following which he had expressed the willingness to apologise to the judge.

The next hearing is scheduled for October 3 (Monday).

Today, Imran and his lawyers appeared in Judge Chaudhry's court. However, the court reader, Choudhry Yasir Ayaz, and stenographer Farooq told the PTI chief that the judicial magistrate was on leave.

Imran then left a message for the judge with Ayaz.

"I have come to apologise to judicial magistrate Zeba Chaudhry," he could be heard saying to the court reader in a video shared by the PTI on Twitter.

"You have to tell Madam Zeba Chaudhry that Imran Khan had visited and wanted to apologise if his words hurt her sentiments," he said. The PTI chief then left the court.

Bail in Section 144 case confirmed

Earlier in the day, a district and sessions court in Islamabad confirmed Imran's interim bail in the case registered against him on charges of violating Section 144.

A first information report (FIR) was registered against Imran last month on charges of violating Section 144 (ban on public gatherings exceeding four persons) by holding the rally in the capital on August 20.

Additional Sessions Judge Zafar Iqbal took up the plea of the PTI chief on Friday amid tight security.

During the hearing, Imran's lawyer Babar Awan said he had recently found out that Imran had been booked under charges of behest. "Has a statement been recorded in this regard?"

At this, the session judge asked if the investigating officer in the case had written a statement on this. "No he did not," the prosecution replied, adding that they only had the statement of the officer who had issued the notification.

Here, Awan said that this was the 21st FIR against Imran. "Even if the investigation officer records his statement now, it won't be acceptable," he contended.

Subsequently, the court confirmed the PTI chief's interim bail against surety bonds worth Rs5,000.

Contempt case

The decision to initiate contempt proceedings against Imran was taken by Justice Aamer Farooq while hearing a petition challenging Gill’s police remand. The court summoned Imran on August 31 and subsequently issued him a show-cause notice.

A day before the hearing, the former prime minister submitted a reply before the IHC wherein he expressed his willingness to “take back” his words about the judge if they were “regarded as inappropriate” and pleaded before the IHC that the judges who had agreed to initiate the case against him should consider withdrawing themselves from the bench as, according to him, they had pre-judged the matter.

However, the IHC had deemed the response to be “unsatisfactory” and asked the PTI chief to submit a “well-considered” response.

Following this, Imran submitted a fresh reply in the court. In the revised response, however, Imran stopped short of rendering an unconditional apology. He stated that “I have a profound regard and respect for this honourable court and its subordinate courts and judge”.

On September 8, the IHC decided to Indict Imran, once again calling his response “unsatisfactory”.

However, at the next hearing on September 22, Imran offered to tender an apology to Judge Zeba and escaped the indictment.

Following his statement in the court, the larger bench hearing the case said: "We are, prima facie, satisfied with the apology rendered by the respondent. Let him file an affidavit for consideration of this court before the next date is fixed."

Opinion

Editorial

A call for bloodshed
30 Nov, 2022

A call for bloodshed

The state has wasted precious time by not consolidating its success in pushing TTP out of its strongholds in the north.
Missing childhoods
30 Nov, 2022

Missing childhoods

THE fact is that despite some legal efforts to end the curse of child marriage taking place in Pakistan under the...
Unemployment concerns
30 Nov, 2022

Unemployment concerns

THE ILO finding that labour market recovery from the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in Pakistan, as in many other...
Back to politics
Updated 29 Nov, 2022

Back to politics

PDM and PTI must realise that neither will get what they want if they keep fighting bitterly at every turn.
Election delay
29 Nov, 2022

Election delay

OF recent, leaders from the ruling PML-N have been dropping hints about a possible delay in general elections after...
Sugar woes
29 Nov, 2022

Sugar woes

IT’S that time of year again when cane growers get anxious over the delay in the commencement of the new sugar...