IHC sets aside ban on Imran’s live coverage

Published
5
In this file photo, PTI chief Imran Khan addresses a public gathering in  Sargodha. — DawnNewsTV/File
In this file photo, PTI chief Imran Khan addresses a public gathering in Sargodha. — DawnNewsTV/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court issued a detailed order a petition of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan, setting aside the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) ban on his live coverage.

The media regulatory body had imposed a blanket ban on live coverage of Mr Khan’s speeches on August 20, after he allegedly threatened Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Zeba Chaudhry, and the Islamabad Police IG and DIG, of ‘consequences’ after the judge handed over physical custody of the ex-PM’s aide, Shahbaz Gill, to police for two days.

IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah issued the detailed order on the petition filed by Mr Khan against the ban on his live coverage on electronic media.

Setting aside the Pemra notification, the IHC asked the media regulatory body to enforce its Code of Conduct in the light of Supreme Court’s judgement to ensure effective enforcement of its directions. The apex court had previously directed Pemra to devise a standard operating procedure for live coverage, in pursuant to which the electronic media had introduced a time-delay mechanism.

In his petition, the PTI chairman contended that under the Pemra Ordinance, one-third of the total members of the watchdog were supposed to constitute a quorum for the meetings requiring a decision by the authority, which comprised a chairman and 12 members.

Arguing before the court at a previous hearing, Mr Khan’s counsel Barrister Syed Ali Zafar pointed out that Pemra invoked sections 26 and 27 to impose a ban on live coverage of the PTI chairman. He said these sections could not be invoked to ban the speeches of a political leader since they empowered the regulator to ensure broadcast of suitable contents. Even otherwise, since Section 26 entailed penal consequences, the regulator was under an obligation to serve a prior notice to Mr Khan before banning his live coverage.

The IHC had disposed of the petition on Monday after hearing both sides.

Published in Dawn, September 7th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

An opening
Updated 03 Nov, 2026

An opening

If this brief opportunity for peace is wasted, sparking a wider conflict, the blame will rest squarely with the US president and the bloodthirsty Zionist regime.
Pakistan’s G-24 role
03 Nov, 2026

Pakistan’s G-24 role

PAKISTAN’S new role as chair of G-24 comes at a crucial moment for the Global South. Developing nations are...
Learning from polio
03 Nov, 2026

Learning from polio

THE eighth polio case of 2026, involving a 13-month-old girl from Khyber’s Bara tehsil, raises an important...
Without consequence
Updated 02 Nov, 2026

Without consequence

From drone attacks to online harassment and legal intimidation, the methods of silencing reporters are multiplying, with little fear of punishment.
Climate diagnosis
02 Nov, 2026

Climate diagnosis

THE Lancet Countdown’s latest findings should change how Pakistan thinks about illness as much as how it thinks...
Fighting harassment
02 Nov, 2026

Fighting harassment

WORKPLACE harassment is often narrowly defined as sexual misconduct. A resolution passed by the National Assembly on...