The Sindh police on Thursday recommended a local court that the case lodged by the parents of Dua Zehra — who went missing from Karachi and was recovered in Punjab — be quashed, observing that charges of her kidnapping and underage marriage were not proven.

On June 7, the Sindh High Court (SHC) had allowed Zehra to decide whom she was intending to reside or go along with after she denied on oath being kidnapped by her purported husband Zaheer Ahmed.

Police had booked Ahmed, cleric Hafiz Ghulam Mustafa, who had allegedly solemnised their underage marriage, and Ali Asghar, a witness to the marriage. A case was lodged under Sections 364-A (kidnapping or abducting a person under the age of fourteen), 216 (harboring offenders) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) read with the Section 3(i) of the Prevention of Trafficking in Person, 2018 read with sections of the Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2013 at the Al Falah police station on the complaint of the girl’s father, Syed Mehdi Ali Kazmi.

On Thursday, Judicial Magistrate (East) Aftab Ahmed Bughio fixed the matter on June 20 for hearing arguments from the parties on the challan filed under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

Earlier, DSP Shaukat Ali Shahani, the investigating officer, filed a final challan stating that during the course of the investigation it was found that Zehra went from Karachi to Punjab of her own free will and was not abducted.

He said that the medico-legal officer’s test certificate suggested Zehra’s age to be between 16 and 17 years, therefore, a kidnapping offence was not committed as under PPC Section 364-A an abductee’s age must be less than 14 years.

The IO further said that since the marriage had taken place in Lahore, and because every province had different marriage traditions and laws, therefore, the relevant sections of the Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2013 were also not applicable to the present case.

DSP Shahani said that since the girl had denied being kidnapped before the magistrate and the SHC, therefore, PPC Section 216 was also not applicable against the groom’s relatives, who on that basis had already been discharged from the case by the court under Section 63 of the CrPC.

The DSP maintained that the remaining detained suspects, Mustafa and Asghar, were also found to be innocent, thus their further detention would be an injustice to them.

He recommended to the court to also discharge them from the case under Section 169 of the CrPC over lack of evidence.

Concluding the report, the IO recommended for the magistrate to accept the challan in C-class (cancel) and order the cancellation of the first information report.

Opinion

Editorial

Drawdown
20 May, 2025

Drawdown

IT appears that the ceasefire will hold, at least in the near term. As Islamabad and New Delhi retreat cautiously...
Unusual benchmarks
20 May, 2025

Unusual benchmarks

THE IMF has slapped Pakistan with several ‘new’ structural benchmarks — some of them quite unusual — under...
Celebrating Sirbaz
20 May, 2025

Celebrating Sirbaz

SIRBAZ Khan has achieved what no other Pakistani has before him. The scale of his accomplishment also makes him one...
Famine in waiting
Updated 19 May, 2025

Famine in waiting

Without decisive action, Pakistan risks falling deeper into a chronic cycle of hunger and poverty. Food insecurity is most harrowing in Gaza.
Erratic policy
19 May, 2025

Erratic policy

THE state needs to make up its mind on the import of used vehicles. According to recent news reports, the FBR may be...
Overdue solace
19 May, 2025

Overdue solace

LATE consolation is a norm for Pakistanis. Although welcome, a newly passed bill that demands tough laws and...