'She is completely free': SHC allows Dua Zehra to decide who she wants to stay with

Published June 8, 2022
A photo of Dua Zehra being brought to the Sindh High Court by police on Wednesday. — DawnNewsTV
A photo of Dua Zehra being brought to the Sindh High Court by police on Wednesday. — DawnNewsTV

The Sindh High Court on Wednesday ruled that Dua Zehra — the teenage girl who was reported missing from Karachi's Shah Faisal Colony on April 16 and was recovered from Bahawalnagar on June 5 — is free to decide her fate.

Dua's parents had lodged a case in Karachi on April 16, alleging that their underage daughter was kidnapped.

Ten days later, Dua had appeared on the media along with Zaheer Ahmed — the person she is said to have contracted marriage with — and announced they had married in Lahore. Her father, Mehdi Kazmi, subsequently produced documents before the media and said she was 13.

Zehra, however, denied to reporters that she was kidnapped and alleged that her parents were lying about her age as she was 18 years old.

When she was first taken into custody on April 26, a Lahore court had allowed the teenager "to go wherever she wanted to and be set at liberty from the premises of the court as desired by her to go wherever she wants to".

However, Dua's parents were adamant that their daughter had been kidnapped and said that she had been forced to give the statement.

The teenager's father had approached the SHC last month with a plea against the Punjab court's orders. Mehdi had stated in the petition that as per her educational documents, birth certificate and other records, Dua’s age was 13 and under the Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2013, it was illegal to marry a minor/underage.

He had asked the court to order a medical examination of his daughter. In the following days, Karachi police repeatedly failed to produce the teenager before the court, earning the judges' ire.

On Sunday, Dua and Zaheer were recovered from Chishtian, Bahawalnagar, and brought to Karachi.

'Does not warrant a case of kidnapping'

Dua Zehra and Zaheer Ahmed appeared before the court today.

The court ruled in its written order that the girl could stay with whomever she wanted to stay with. "She is completely free," the judgment reads.

In the light of evidence furnished, it does not warrant a case of kidnapping, the court ruled.

The SHC directed the investigating officer of the case to submit a supplementary challan of the case before the court.

The court also sought from the investigation officer a medical certificate and statement recorded in the Sindh High Court regarding the determination of the age of the girl.

Before wrapping up the petition, the SHC remarked that the trial court must continue its proceedings, adding it was the discretion of the Sindh government to present Dua in the Lahore High Court.

Court allows parents to meet Dua

Before the pronouncement of the decision, the court permitted the parents of Dua to meet their daughter for "ten minutes" earlier in the day.

"Search all persons and have Dua meet her parents in the chamber," the judge directed the police during the hearing of a plea filed by the teenager's father for her recovery.

At the previous hearing, the judge had ordered Dua's medical tests to determine her age, which could be a deciding factor in this case as Dua claims she is 18 years old and has said in her statement to the court that she "married Zaheer out of her own free will", while her parents maintain that she is 14 years old and that she was kidnapped and forced into child marriage.

Referring to the court's directive from the previous hearing, the petitioner's counsel Advocate Altaf Khosa said he wanted to submit some documents.

"Whatever you want to submit, present it to the trial court," replied Justice Ghaffar, saying that the SHC was moved for Dua's recovery and she had been recovered.

The Sindh prosecutor general also requested the court to dispose of the plea and refer the case to a trial court for further proceedings.

Moreover, the Sindh advocate general told the court that Dua had to be presented before the Lahore High Court (LHC) on June 10.

He appealed to the court to place Dua in Punjab police's custody so that she could be presented before the LHC on the said date.

However, Dua's father, Mehdi Kazmi, took exception to the advocate general's request and contended that the case was being heard in the SHC.

Addressing him, Justice Ghaffar said: "The girl has recorded her statement. You are becoming emotional."

When the judge asked Kazmi whether he wanted to say something, Dua's father raised objections to the teenager's medical report.

He pointed out that the report concluded that Dua's age was 17. "It has been 17 years since I married. How can my daughter be 17 years of age?"

The judge, however, said that Dua had recorded her statement before the court.

"We have to take into consideration the decisions of the Supreme Court and Federal Shariat Court," he added.

'Have challenged medical report'

Speaking to the media outside the courtroom, Dua's father reiterated his objections to her medical report and said: "We have challenged this medical report."

Alongside him, his counsel alleged that the medical report was "based on mala fide" and maintained that they had documents pertaining to Dua's age.

He said no medical board was formed to determine Dua's age and claimed that a "junior doctor prepared her medical report".

Father claims Dua wants to return home

Later, Dua's father again spoke to the media after meeting her and claimed she wanted to return home.

"She wants to go home and record a statement before the judge as well," he said, adding that "police have stopped us from meeting the girl any further".

He said they had requested the court to record Dua's statement again but even the judge said that the statement was recorded just once.

"I did not get justice [even] when I knocked the doors of justice," he remarked.

Kazmi said he had documents from the National Database and Registration Authority and other government departments.

"If these legal documents are incorrect, should I set them on fire?" he questioned.

He appealed to the federal government, Rangers director general, and other authorities for justice.

Opinion

Editorial

Taking stock
Updated 14 Aug, 2022

Taking stock

There are numerous reasons behind our predicament, and many of our wounds are self-inflicted.
Medicine in short supply
14 Aug, 2022

Medicine in short supply

THAT rising import prices of pharmaceutical raw materials and increasing production costs of manufacturers have...
Police excesses
Updated 13 Aug, 2022

Police excesses

Crass thuggery and victimisation of ordinary citizens are unlikely to earn govt plaudits from any quarter.
Afghan cleric’s killing
13 Aug, 2022

Afghan cleric’s killing

THAT a suicide bomber belonging to the self-styled Islamic State group managed to target a senior Taliban cleric in...
No room for hockey
13 Aug, 2022

No room for hockey

THERE have been accusations and clarifications as the blame game rumbles on. Yet despite workers of the PTI ...
Militancy redux
Updated 12 Aug, 2022

Militancy redux

There is fear and confusion all around, and it is for the state to bring clarity to the situation.