LAHORE: A Lahore High Court division bench on Thursday suspended a single bench’s decision against the appointment of Prof Dr Asad Aslam as administrator of the Punjab Human Organ Transplant Authority (HOTA).

The two-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Muhammad Ameer Bhatti issued the interim stay order on an intra court appeal (ICA) challenging the decision of the single bench passed on a petition of Prof Dr Mahmood Ayaz.

The appellant’s counsel argued that the respondent (Ayaz) lacked requisite experience of management and had teaching experience only. He said the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment against the post in question.

The counsel also questioned the jurisdiction of the court to intervene in the domain of the executive saying the matter in hand was a technical and policy matter. He asked the division bench to set aside the decision of the single bench.

The chief justice suspended the impugned decision and also sought replies from the respondents by Sept 26.

The single judge had on May 13 set aside the notification of Dr Aslam’s appointment for being illegal, unlawful and without lawful authority. The judge had referred the matter to the chief minister with a direction to appoint the candidate highest on merit preferably within a period of 15 days.

Allowing the petition of Dr Ayaz, the single bench had ruled that the chief minister did not enjoy absolute power under the law to appoint a person of his choice as administrator of the Punjab HOTA.

Ayaz’s counsel told the court that a monitoring authority, headed by the health minister, interviewed the candidates and consequently, petitioner was placed at Sr.No.1 in the merit list and respondents Dr Aslam and Pro Dr Farid Ahmad Khan at Serial No 2 and 3, respectively.

Consequently a summary was submitted to the chief minister, who approved the name of Dr Aslam for the appointment on Dec 20, 2021.

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned notification was illegal and had been issued in violation of law laid down by the superior courts. He added that the petitioner had been ignored by the chief minister without any lawful justification and reasons.

Published in Dawn, May 27th, 2022

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
Updated 20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

True de-escalation means Israel must start behaving like a normal state, not a rogue nation that threatens the entire region.
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...