ANOTHER attempt to sue for peace with the outlawed TTP is being made, again facilitated by the Afghan Taliban that rule Kabul. According to a spokesman of the Afghan Taliban, there has been “significant progress” in talks between the government and the TTP that took place in Kabul, with the result that the latter has extended a ceasefire till the end of this month.

Moreover, in an apparent goodwill gesture, the state has freed and reportedly pardoned some convicted high-profile militants, including Muslim Khan, once considered the face of the TTP Swat.

Read more: 24 law-enforcement officials martyred in TTP attacks since late last month in KP

However, both the civilian and military authorities in Pakistan remain tight-lipped about these developments. But before the success or otherwise of this nascent peace process is considered, some tough questions need to be answered by the state.

Primarily, the people of Pakistan need to know what the finer points of any agreement with the TTP are. After all, this is a group that has waged war on Pakistan and has been responsible for some of the most atrocious acts of terrorism the country has witnessed, so there is natural concern whether the TTP’s leadership and cadres will be willing to give up the way of the gun. Moreover, is the state willing to simply forgive those whose hands are stained with the blood of our soldiers and civilians — including the children of APS Peshawar — and who remain unrepentant? Also, in order to make peace, how much is the state willing to concede to the militants? Will they swear to respect the law of the land and democratic governance, and renounce violence? The state, therefore, needs to tell the people — preferably through parliament — what exactly the details of the peace process are.

Peace is required, especially in the war-ravaged erstwhile tribal belt, but there must be a difference between peace and capitulation to the demands of the militants. Moreover, it should be remembered that a similar exercise to make peace with the TTP was launched by the previous government last year, which collapsed soon after it began.

Read more: TTP still active with up to 5,000 fighters: UN

While it may bring short-term peace, any agreement that legitimises the TTP without the group surrendering its weapons and promising to respect the Constitution will sow the seeds for major trouble in the future. Also, the state must be clear about how far an amnesty should go.

For example, will those responsible for the deaths of thousands of Pakistanis be ‘forgiven’ with the stroke of a pen? This will surely send the wrong message. The fact is, it will be very difficult to mainstream the TTP considering the nature of the group, and if they are allowed a foothold, the militants will effectively wipe out all other groups that disagree with their ideology. Therefore, more transparency, and plenty of caution, is needed on part of the state regarding peace talks with the TTP.

Published in Dawn, May 20th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...