THE decision of the Supreme Court against the dissolution of the National Assembly, calling it an unconstitutional act, is not a verdict in favour or against any single individual or party; it is a decision in favour of Pakistan and in line with the oath of office taken by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial. The matter is not about winning of the government or the opposition, but about the sanctity of the legislature and the supreme law of the land.

Unlike the happenings of the past, the Supreme Court has paved the way for strengthening democracy in its real sense without any discrimination, and the verdict should be respected by all parliamentarians and institutions alike.
Live long Pakistan!

Faheem Mumtaz Kalwar
Jamshoro

(2) IT is with much pleasure that I read the recent judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) which has restored the faith of commoners in the rule of law and democratic process. As a lawyer practising before the Indian Supreme Court and a member of the SC Bar Association, it is always a pleasure to watch the lawyers in Pakistan rising to the occasion and themselves become petitioners before the Supreme Court.

An earlier SCP judgment in Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif vs President of Pakistan, PLD 1993 Supreme Court, 473, was cited by the Indian Supreme Court in its judgment in the S.R. Bommai vs Union of India (1994) 3, SCC 1. Since then, S.R. Bommai ratio is firmly established in Indian jurisprudence.

The current SCP decision will also get cited by other democratic jurisdictions.

Prashant Padmanabhan
Advocate on Record, Supreme
Court of India
New Delhi, India

(3) AS a citizen of Pakistan, I am glad that we finally have clarity about the future course of action. I would have been happier, however, if the court also initiated an investigation into the content of the controversial ‘letter’ that has been behind the whole episode. As citizens of Pakistan, we would like to know if there is substantive evidence of foreign intervention. Also, the Supreme Court should deliver a verdict on the pending presidential reference regarding floor-crossing. The two steps will surely establish the rule of law.

Sheikh Taimur Nawaz
Islamabad

(4) THE verdict of the Supreme Court of Pakistan is rightly hailed as a landmark in the country’s constitutional and democratic history. It has successfully prevented the suspension of a part of the Constitution and has acknowledged its supremacy. It is being celebrated with due justification, but it has opened up an avenue for judicial interference in parliamentary affairs.

Of course, politicians are to be blamed for failing to sort out their affairs within the National Assembly. They should have learnt that they can uphold and ensure parliamen­tary sovereignty only by respecting each other. It is a pity that the only thing the politicians have learnt is the art of crafting slogans.

Zia Rizwan
Mandi Bahauddin

Published in Dawn, April 10th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Enrolment drive
Updated 10 May, 2024

Enrolment drive

The authorities should implement targeted interventions to bring out-of-school children, especially girls, into the educational system.
Gwadar outrage
10 May, 2024

Gwadar outrage

JUST two days after the president, while on a visit to Balochistan, discussed the need for a political dialogue to...
Save the witness
10 May, 2024

Save the witness

THE old affliction of failed enforcement has rendered another law lifeless. Enacted over a decade ago, the Sindh...
May 9 fallout
Updated 09 May, 2024

May 9 fallout

It is important that this chapter be closed satisfactorily so that the nation can move forward.
A fresh approach?
09 May, 2024

A fresh approach?

SUCCESSIVE governments have tried to address the problems of Balochistan — particularly the province’s ...
Visa fraud
09 May, 2024

Visa fraud

THE FIA has a new task at hand: cracking down on fraudulent work visas. This was prompted by the discovery of a...