IHC’s verdict

Published February 5, 2022

THERE are some verdicts that throw a lifeline to a nation and slow its descent into a dystopian future where justice and merit have no place. Thursday’s judgement by the Islamabad High Court on identical petitions pertaining to the Federal Government Employees Housing Authority’s allotment of plots in four sectors of Islamabad certainly counts among these.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani ruled as unconstitutional and illegal FGEHA’s revised policy whereby top judges, lawyers and bureaucrats were allotted plots on subsidised rates, and ordered the authority to develop housing schemes for the general public.

The verdict highlighted the egregious flaws in the registration process, noting the lack of transparency and flagrant conflict of interest evident therein. For example, it found the list of beneficiaries even included some judges who had been dismissed from service following disciplinary proceedings. The bench also held that the inclusion of the Supreme Court, IHC and district judiciary among the entitled groups — something they did not even request — is “not in conformity with the impartiality and independence of the judiciary as an institution”, noting that the FGEHA was a litigant before these judicial branches.

Read: IHC strikes down subsidised plots for judges, bureaucrats

According to the court, “The sole object appears to have been to extend extraordinary pecuniary benefits to a few selected senior bureaucrats and [superior court] judges… . The policy governing the scheme … [appears] to be in the nature of advancing elite capture and in disregard to the well-being and welfare of the people at large”.

It is a devastating indictment of the government’s priorities and its contempt for the principles of social justice. Indeed, this is what an extractive state looks like, where privileged segments of society fatten themselves on what should be collective resources, while ordinary citizens must scrounge for even the basics.

According to the court, the public exchequer sustained a loss of over Rs1tr as a result of the subsidised allocation of plots to select members of certain groups in four prime sectors of the capital. Then, to underscore the appalling injustice, the ruling listed the many deprivations suffered by the people of Pakistan — the want, the hunger, the disadvantages in health and education that condemn millions of our children to a future where they cannot hope to improve their lot.

Catering to the enrichment of a few at the cost of the many is what has brought the country to such a pass. With this scathing judgement, the government has no choice but to change course. It must come up with a rational policy that prioritises public interest and is executed transparently. Land allotments must be made with a view to providing shelter, not to curry favour with the powerful or to enable select individuals to make windfall gains at the cost of the state’s coffers and the country’s progress.

Published in Dawn, February 5th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Green tokenism
Updated 08 Jul, 2025

Green tokenism

Climate decisions must be based on facts, not politics — guided by independent science and open to public scrutiny.
Cotton decline
08 Jul, 2025

Cotton decline

PAKISTAN’S cotton economy is in a crisis. Production has fallen from a peak of 14m bales 10 years ago to 5.5m ...
Pet problems
08 Jul, 2025

Pet problems

PAKISTANIS’ obsession with exotic pets keeps ending in tragedy. Incidents like the recent lion attack in a Lahore...
No preparedness
Updated 06 Jul, 2025

No preparedness

With frequency of calamitous weather events increasing, the country cannot afford to be in denial after every tragedy.
Saarc’s future
Updated 07 Jul, 2025

Saarc’s future

South Asia’s vast potential cannot be held hostage forever by India.
PSB’s waning authority
06 Jul, 2025

PSB’s waning authority

IT has been two decades since the National Sports Policy was introduced but its implementation leaves much to be...