Mini-budget laid before Senate amid opposition protest

Published January 5, 2022
A file photo of Finance Minister Shaukat Tarin. — Govt of Pakistan Twitter
A file photo of Finance Minister Shaukat Tarin. — Govt of Pakistan Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The government on Tuesday finally laid the controversial finance supplementary bill, generally known as mini-budget, before the Senate amid opposition’s noisy protest as Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani referred the bill to the house committee concerned with the directive to finalise recommendations within three days.

The opposition members stood up and raised anti-government slogans as soon as the chairman gave floor to Finance Minister Shaukat Tarin to lay a copy of the money bill, the Finance (Supplementary) Bill, 2021, which the government had already introduced in the National Assembly on December 30, with another controversial State Bank of Pakistan (Amendment) Bill, 2021 aimed at granting autonomy to the central bank.

Sanjrani asks committee to finalise recommendations within three days

The opposition members later in their speeches blasted the government for presenting the mini-budget on the “dictation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)”, terming it a “total surrender of the country’s economic sovereignty”.

The approval of the finance (supplementary) bill seeking to amend certain laws related to taxes and duties as well as the SBP bill is necessary to ensure that sixth review of Pakistan’s $6 billion Extended Fund Facility gets cleared by the IMF’s Executive Board which is scheduled to meet on January 12 to decide about the disbursement of about $1bn tranche.

The government laid the bill in the Senate under Article 73 of the Constitution which deals with the “procedure with respect to money bills”, which are only required to be passed by the National Assembly, the lower house of parliament.

Article 73(1) states that “Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 70, a money bill shall originate in the National Assembly: provided that simultaneously when a money bill, including the finance bill containing the annual budget statement, is presented in the National Assembly, a copy thereof shall be transmitted to the Senate which may, within fourteen days, make recommendations thereon to the National Assembly”.

These recommendations, however, are not binding for the National Assembly and it can approve a money bill, even without considering them.

Although the Constitution provides 14 days to the Senate for preparing recommendations, the chairman’s directive that the committee complete its task within three days clearly shows that the government wants to complete the process as early as possible and it may make an attempt to get the money bill passed from the National Assembly before Jan 12.

Talking to reporters on Monday, Mr Tarin had stated that the Senate could finalise its recommendations in four days and then the bill could be passed by the National Assembly. He, however, had said that there was no problem for the IMF, if the approval of the bill was delayed for a few days.

The government succeeded in presenting the money bill in the Senate despite having a thin attendance on the treasury benches.

During the question hour, the opposition pointed out lack of quorum after staging a walkout from the house to register its protest over some remarks of Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Ali Mohammad Khan while responding to a question regarding the foreign visits of Prime Minister Imran Khan and the government failed to ensure the presence of the required 26 members (one-fourth of the total 100-member house) despite the chairman provided them ample time to do so by ordering the ringing of the bells twice. However, the opposition members returned to the house after some time, thus facilitating the government to complete the quorum and present the bill.

Speaking on a point of order, Raza Rabbani of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) regretted that the government had brought the two legislations as per IMF conditions. Amid slogans of “shame, shame” from the opposition members, he said the finance minister had himself admitted in his recent statement that the government had increased the oil prices on the IMF’s directive.

He praised the finance minister for showing “candidness” by publicly acknowledging that the talks with the IMF remained tough due to the US pressure on the donor agency.

“The nation wants to know what pressure the US wants to exert on Pakistan through the IMF which has forced the government to mortgage Pakistan,” he said.

Mr Rabbani asked the minister to inform the nation through this house as to what type of pressure the US was putting on Pakistan.

Mr Sanjrani, however, intelligently rescued Mr Tarin when he said the finance minister would respond to the point while winding up the debate.

Parliamentary leader of the PPP in the Senate Sherry Rehman formally began debate on the mini-budget and termed it “economic murder” of the nation.

In her speech, she said the present deal with the IMF had serious implications for Pakistan’s decision making to protect its “national security interests”.

Stating that the country’s economy was at the “door of bankruptcy”, she predicted that this mini-budget would become the cause of the fall of the present regime.

Ms Rehman particularly talked about the SBP bill, which is yet to come before the Senate, and said after passage of the law, the government would not be able to borrow from its own central bank and it would have to approach the commercial banks.

“What if we need money for the survival of the country? What if the defence of the country requires emergency mobilisation of funds? Where will the government mobilise funds from? The international banks? This is a bizarre trade of the country’s sovereignty. With the Taliban cutting our border fence on one side and on the other Modi’s aggression, any contingency can arise. But it looks like we will need the IMF’s approval to even defend our country,” Ms Rehman went on saying while criticising the government’s economic policies. She said the SBP should be retained with the government as “the lender of last resort”.

“Unfortunately, the future looks bleak due to the disastrous mini-budget. the Tabahi Sarkar has sold the Pakistani economy to the IMF and completely turned their back on the plight of the people of Pakistan,” she said. Instead of doing negotiations, she alleged, the PTI government was taking dictations from the IMF.

The proceedings of the house were later adjourned till Friday morning due to lack of quorum which was pointed out by the opposition after staging walkout from the house when the government failed to give an assurance regarding arranging a briefing on the issue of Reko Diq mine project on the demand of National Party Senator Tahir Bizenjo.

Published in Dawn, January 5th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Updated 16 May, 2022

Electoral reforms

EARLY elections or not? That is the question. And it seems to be weighing heavy on the mind of everyone in the...
16 May, 2022

Iran deal revival

WHERE the nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1 is concerned, a great deal of fluidity exists regarding its fate....
16 May, 2022

Deprived of funds

THIS May, Pakistan’s former Fata region will complete its fourth year of merger with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The...
Imran’s lesson
Updated 15 May, 2022

Imran’s lesson

Patronage of the security and intelligence apparatus exacts a heavy price and almost never delivers any long-term dividends.
15 May, 2022

Small mercies

AT a time when Pakistan is getting closer to the brink with its foreign currency reserves dropping to just around...
15 May, 2022

Child sexual abuse

IT is interesting that despite the strictures of society and political leaders on community evils, there is little...