Kashmir policy

Published November 7, 2021
The writer is a retired ambassador, an author and the president of the Lahore Council for World Affairs.
The writer is a retired ambassador, an author and the president of the Lahore Council for World Affairs.

THE effectiveness of a policy must be judged by its results. Looked at from this perspective, our Kashmir policy, which is closely related to our India policy, cannot be considered a success. In every way, our position on Kashmir vis-à-vis India is worse than what it was in the early stages of Pakistan’s history. In the 1940s and 1950s, we could get the UN Security Council to pass resolutions on Kashmir to our satisfaction. Gradually, it became more and more difficult to get such results.

The situation has deteriorated to such an extent that after India’s aggressive actions of Aug 5, 2019, the UN Security Council, subsequent to informal consultations, declined to hold a formal meeting to consider our complaints against India on the Kashmir issue. It also did not bother to issue even a presidential statement let alone adopt a resolution.

India’s recent election to the Human Rights Council with the support of the overwhelming majority of the UN membership is the latest example of the international community’s disregard of India’s massive violations of human rights in occupied Kashmir. We seem to be losing ground to India even within the OIC, which refused to convene an extraordinary meeting of foreign ministers to consider India’s aggressive steps of Aug 5, 2019, in occupied Kashmir.

Pakistan’s position must be grounded in realpolitik.

Excessive reliance on moral and legal arguments of our Kashmir case to the neglect of the demands of realpolitik, which governs international politics especially in dealing with major issues of peace and security, has been the main factor which has led to the gradual weakening of our position on the Kashmir dispute. It is imperative for our legal and moral arguments to be supported by sufficient national power so as to persuade India to reconsider its intransigence on Kashmir.

Read: Why Kashmir matters

In reality the reverse has happened. At the national level, with the passage of time, the economic and military balance between Pakistan and India has turned to our disadvantage. For instance, India’s GDP is now estimated to be $3.05 trillion as against Pakistan’s $286 billion. Consequently, our well-reasoned moral and legal arguments are falling on deaf ears in the international community. Our position vis-à-vis India has also been weakened because of the absence of clarity and consistency about our strategic goals and policies in dealing with India and Kashmir.

At the international level, the defining feature is the growing US-China rivalry which is deepening the Indo-US strategic partnership while pushing Pakistan and China closer to each other. This development poses its own strategic challenges for Pakistan in the form of the evolving realignment of forces and alliances at regional and international levels. At the regional level, even if one ignores the challenges posed by the Afghan Taliban’s victory next door, Pakistan is faced with an enduring threat emanating from India because of its hegemonic designs, the growing sway of Hindutva despite some liberal voices here and there in that country, and outstanding disputes particularly Kashmir. It is doubtful that any of these factors or India’s intransigence on Kashmir will change to our advantage in the foreseeable future.

At the civilisational level, Kashmir is located along the fault lines of the Islamic and Hindu civilisations. As the issue of Palestine clearly demonstrates, such civilisational disputes take decades if not centuries to resolve, if at all. This factor further underscores the need for us to rely on a long-term strategy grounded in power realities rather than a short-term approach for a settlement of the Kashmir dispute.

The moral is that Pakistan must build up more rapidly than India its national power defined comprehensively in political, economic and military terms, backed by a proactive foreign policy for it to have any chance of success in dealing with the Kashmir dispute. In the interest of political stability, democratic norms must be strengthened and state institutions must operate within their well-defined constitutional roles in Pakistan unlike what has happened in the past.

On the economic side, we need to bring about far-reaching structural reforms to accelerate GDP growth rate, promote scientific and technological advancement, and implement policies of austerity and self-reliance while maintaining a credible security deterrent. Our tactical policy adjustments must be within the framework of long-term India and Kashmir strategies with realistic goals and well-thought-out plans of action grounded in power realities. Our inability to do so will worsen our position on Kashmir vis-à-vis India.

The writer is a retired ambassador, an author and the president of the Lahore Council for World Affairs.

javid.husain@gmail.com

Published in Dawn, November 7th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Blatant Islamophobia
Updated 30 Jan, 2023

Blatant Islamophobia

Muslim extremists and terrorist outfits are emboldened by hateful acts.
Modern slavery
30 Jan, 2023

Modern slavery

MODERN slavery is a wide-ranging term that can encompass a multitude of scenarios. Common to all of them, however, ...
Remarkable Sania
30 Jan, 2023

Remarkable Sania

BRINGING to a close a career in which she smashed stereotypes, Sania Mirza delivered almost the perfect ending in ...
Losing grip
Updated 29 Jan, 2023

Losing grip

The state and the government are responsible for providing Imran with the security he deserves as a former prime minister.
Telling silence
Updated 29 Jan, 2023

Telling silence

THE silence of the Sindh government over the recent exposé in this paper about Karachi’s water tanker mafia ...
Palestine escalation
29 Jan, 2023

Palestine escalation

THE fire of conflict once again threatens to envelop the land of Palestine, as the growing cycle of violence refuses...