NAB fails to locate Babar Ghauri’s properties

Published September 15, 2021
This file photo shows former minister Babar Ghauri.
This file photo shows former minister Babar Ghauri.

KARACHI: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) authorities have failed to locate and attach the properties owned by former minister Babar Ghauri for around two years after the court declared him a proclaimed offender in a case pertaining to illegal jobs’ regularization in the Karachi Port Trust (KPT).

Mr Ghauri, then a leader of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, along with then KPT chairmen Javed Hanif, Rauf Akhtar Farooqui and others, has been charged with illegal regularisation of 940 employees of the KPT.

When the matter was recently taken up before Accountability Court-II judge Aaliya Latif Unnar, an investigating officer (IO) of the NAB appeared and requested for more time to submit a report regarding completion of the process of attachment of the properties owned by the former minister, as ordered by the court under Section 88 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Allowing the request, the judge directed the IO to furnish such report by the next date of hearing and adjourned the matter.

Seeks time from accountability court to locate and attach the assets

Six accused, including a sitting legislator belonging to the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan, Javed Hanif Khan, have already been indicted in the case.

The court had separated the matter against Babar Ghauri and ordered the IO to initiate the proceedings of proclamation and attachment of his properties.

In October 2019, the judicial and prosecution officials said the court had declared Babar Ghauri a proclaimed offender after the IO had submitted a report stating that there was no likelihood of arrest of the former minister in the near future since he had probably gone into hiding to avoid arrest.

Accepting his report, the court had declared Mr Ghauri a proclaimed offender.

In the meanwhile, the court had also directed the NAB’s IO to furnish a report regarding completion of the process of attachment of his properties, if any owned by him, as required under the law.

“The court had ordered attachment of his properties in October 2019,” the judicial staffers said, requesting anonymity. “However, on each hearing the IO is required to submit a report regarding compliance with the court’s directives, but every time the IO requests for more time to comply with the directives,” they added.

Published in Dawn, September 15th, 2021

Opinion

Sub judice rule
18 Sep 2021

Sub judice rule

It is time this objection, sub judice, is laid to rest.
The Black Caps folly
Updated 18 Sep 2021

The Black Caps folly

There is so much wrong — and worrying — about the entire sorry episode of New Zealand backing out of Pakistan tour.
CT NAP revisited
Updated 18 Sep 2021

CT NAP revisited

A policy of appeasement towards extremists has undermined the state’s writ.
Pathways for reform
Updated 17 Sep 2021

Pathways for reform

Even now the government has said they are listening, but they have not said how they are listening.

Editorial

Blinken’s remarks
Updated 18 Sep 2021

Blinken’s remarks

The US establishment cannot scapegoat Pakistan for two decades of bad policy in Afghanistan.
18 Sep 2021

Worrying survey

THE findings of the Labour Force Survey 2018-19 indicate that some important headline trends have already taken or...
18 Sep 2021

Special needs

THE fact that only 3,653 children with special needs, out of some 300,000 in Sindh, are registered with the...
TTP amnesty?
Updated 17 Sep 2021

TTP amnesty?

An amnesty should be for some individuals, not the entire outfit.
17 Sep 2021

Media regulation

THE needless controversy over media regulation may finally be heading for a resolution. In a meeting with ...
17 Sep 2021

Refusing audit

THE continuous resistance put up by several public-sector organisations to submitting their accounts for audit by ...