Lawyers to protest today over proposed appointment of SHC chief to SC

Published August 10, 2021
Lawyers have given a call to boycott court proceedings across Sindh. — AFP/File
Lawyers have given a call to boycott court proceedings across Sindh. — AFP/File

KARACHI: Three lawyers’ bodies of Sindh have given a call for boycotting legal proceedings throughout the province on Tuesday (today) against the proposed appointment of Chief Justice of the Sindh High Court Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh as an ad hoc judge of the Supreme Court.

Speaking at a press conference after a joint meeting of the Sindh Bar Council (SBC), Sindh High Court Bar Association (SHCBA) and Karachi Bar Association (KBA), the lawyers’ representatives said they would not appear before the courts on Tuesday when the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) would be meeting in Islamabad to consider the proposed appointment of CJ Shaikh to the apex court.

They expressed the hope that the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and other bar associations of the country would also support them in what they called their struggle for the appointment and elevation of judges on the principle of seniority.

SBC vice chairman Ziaul Hassan Lanjar, SHCBA president Salahuddin Ahmed and KBA president Naeem Qureshi deplored that the principle of seniority was not being followed in judicial appointments and the elevation of the high court judges to the SC.

“This time around a threat to the independence of the judiciary is coming from within the judiciary whose certain members are not ready to limit and control their discretion,” said Mr Ahmed.

He said it seemed that the JCP had not evolved criteria for the appointment and elevation of judges to the SC. “Sometimes the JCP prefers seniority, sometimes competence and sometimes command of a judge on certain nature of cases,” he said.

He added that such criteria were creating rift within the judiciary and among the judges as was witnessed during the hearing of some high-profile cases in the Supreme Court in the recent past.

SBC VC Ziaul Hassan Lanjar said an excuse was being made that in the past senior judges in high courts themselves had recommended elevation of junior judges. However, he said, it had now become clear that no such consent was given by the senior judges for the elevation of junior judges.

A press release issued after the joint meeting stated that in the first place “Article 182 of the Constitution does not even allow appointment of a Chief Justice as an ad hoc judge of Supreme Court and only permits a retired judge of Supreme Court or judge of a high court to be appointed”.

It added that even if a chief justice was conceived to be a judge of a high court, the consent of the chief justice of the province was required for the appointment of a judge under Article 182(b) of the Constitution.

Published in Dawn, August 10th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

1971 in retrospect
Updated 28 Nov, 2022

1971 in retrospect

The point of no return came when the military launched Operation Searchlight in March 1971.
Gender-based violence
28 Nov, 2022

Gender-based violence

IT is a war without boundaries and seemingly without end. A UN report on femicide released on Nov 25, the...
Battle against dacoits
28 Nov, 2022

Battle against dacoits

THE Punjab police is clearly fighting a formidable, and so far losing, battle against the criminal gangs based in ...
Policy rate hike
Updated 27 Nov, 2022

Policy rate hike

The decision to hike the policy rate by 100bps is a step in the right direction, even if intended to appease the IMF.
Vawda’s reprieve
27 Nov, 2022

Vawda’s reprieve

FAISAL Vawda should be relieved. After years of running from a reckoning for submitting a false declaration in his...
Gujarat’s ghosts
27 Nov, 2022

Gujarat’s ghosts

TWO decades have passed since the bloody Gujarat riots, one of the worst spasms of anti-Muslim violence witnessed in...