EUROPEAN states have long professed a commitment to the separation of church and state, as well as allowing people to live according to their beliefs. However, a series of events over the last few years has raised legitimate questions about how far this commitment really goes. The latest amongst moves contrary to the spirit of tolerance has been a ruling from the EU’s top court that allows employers to ban female workers from wearing the headscarf while on the job in order to present an image of “neutrality”.

While the court has left it up to the judiciaries of the individual member states to determine the “general need” of employers in calling for the ban, the ruling sends the wrong message nonetheless, especially at a time when the far right is gaining ground across Europe. Instead of strengthening European secularism, the ban will fuel divisions based on culture and religion. As a spokesman for the Turkish presidency said, the decision “is an attempt to grant legitimacy to racism”.

Read: Choosing to wear a veil in Britian

Europe claims to be the bastion of so-called Enlightenment values, but its record, particularly in the 20th century, of treating the ‘other’ is not a good one. The Holocaust instantly springs to mind, while the treatment meted out by European colonisers to people of colour in Africa — the French in Algeria, the Belgians in Congo — does not inspire confidence. Therefore, moves by the EU to curtail the religious freedoms of Muslims and others in the bloc need to be reviewed.

It is not just Muslims that are facing rising xenophobia in Europe. For example, Jews have been attacked for wearing religious headgear while the EU court has also backed a Belgian decision to effectively ban halal and kosher meat by calling for animals to be stunned before slaughter, which is in conflict with Islamic and Jewish teachings.

The fact is that many states in Europe are pandering to right-wing populists in targeting the cultural and religious practices of immigrants and European residents of non-white backgrounds. While some restrictions, for example the niqab ban, are based on cogent concerns, as questions of confirming identity arise, what great security threat does a woman worker in a hijab pose, or someone eating halal or kosher meat, for that matter? Either the EU should endeavour to ensure justice for all regardless of national origin or religion, or admit to the fact that some within its borders are less equal than others.

Published in Dawn, July 21st, 2021

Opinion

Justice for judges
Updated 30 Jul 2021

Justice for judges

It beggars belief that a senior high court judge is incompetent to serve in the Supreme Court.
Follow the child
30 Jul 2021

Follow the child

Observe the child and give her space to explore her own instincts.
Cost of neoliberalism
30 Jul 2021

Cost of neoliberalism

Our mental health crisis must be seen in the larger sociopolitical context.

Editorial

30 Jul 2021

Judge’s elevation

A CONTROVERSY roiling the legal fraternity for a few weeks has come to a head. It was precipitated by the Judicial...
PTI’s Sialkot win
30 Jul 2021

PTI’s Sialkot win

The PML-N’s internal duality is a particularly acute factor that is dragging down the party in electoral contests.
30 Jul 2021

Attack on Chinese

AN attack targeting two Chinese nationals in Karachi on Wednesday should put the security apparatus on alert in ...
29 Jul 2021

Saudi FM’s visit

THE Saudi-Pakistan relationship is decades old and has weathered a number of geopolitical storms. Of late, ties came...
29 Jul 2021

SBP’s high hopes

THE June spike in the current account deficit notwithstanding, the State Bank doesn’t look too worried about the...
Joy and sadness on K2
Updated 29 Jul 2021

Joy and sadness on K2

Pakistan’s mountains have a commercial value that remains untapped.